Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Prieur, 277 So. 2d 126.

864 citing documents.

  • State v. Ghoram 290 So. 2d 850 La. 1974
  • State v. Lewis 288 So. 2d 348 La. 1974
    See, e. g., State v. Jordan, La., (1973); State v. Prieur, La., (1973); State v. Moore, La., (1973); State v. Jefferson, La., (1973); State v. Cosie and Duplessis, La.
  • State v. Pettle 286 So. 2d 625 La. 1973
    we said: "The probative value of evidence of unrelated offenses in relation to the charged offense should therefore be weighed in light of its possible prejudicial effect, its tendency to influence the triers of fact improperly as to the present guilt of the accused.
  • State v. Jefferson 284 So. 2d 882 La. 1973
  • State v. Cosie 295 So. 2d 165 La. 1973
  • State v. Linkletter 286 So. 2d 330 La. 1973
    If the State chooses to re-try the defendants in the instant case, (cited in defendants’ Bill No. 6), regarding the admissibility of evidence of other crimes, to the renewed prosecution of defendants for this offense.
  • State v. Linkletter 286 So. 2d 321 La. 1973
    [3] If the State re-tries these defendants, (used in defendants' Assignment of Error No. 10), regarding evidence of other crimes, to the renewed prosecution of the offense.
  • State v. Grant 295 So. 2d 168 La. 1973
  • State v. Frazier 283 So. 2d 261 La. 1973
  • State v. Howard 283 So. 2d 197 La. 1973
    *199 The defendant contends that the reference to other robberies violates the rule of State v. Prieur, La., (1973).
  • State v. Tharp 284 So. 2d 536 La. 1973
  • State v. Moore 278 So. 2d 781 La. 1973
    In State v. Prieur, La., (1973) and State v. Jordan, La., (1973), we held evidence of extraneous offenses irrelevant and prejudicial to the accused.
  • State v. Frezal 278 So. 2d 64 La. 1973
    * * *" The admission of evidence of other offenses merely to pile up prejudice against and ill feeling toward a defendant rather than actually to establish a point still at issue (here, intent) was the thrust of much of the criticism by this court in State v. Prieur, La., , No. 52365 on our docket, decided February 19, 1973.
  • State v. Prieur 277 So. 2d 134 La. 1973
    In State v. Prieur, La., (1973), decided February 19, 1973, a case which involved this same defendant, we recognized the potential danger that can result when evidence of other acts of misconduct is introduced during a trial.