Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Brantley v. Brown, 277 So. 2d 141.

20 citing documents.

Dowe v. Grady 540 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Trahan v. Gulf Insurance Co. 525 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Crowe v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 416 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
James v. Vance 411 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
McInnis v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co., Langlois [Langlois v. Allied Chemical Corporation, 258 La.
Lytell v. Hushfield 408 So. 2d 1344 La. 1982
1976); Langlois v. Allied Chemical Corp., supra .
Kaplan v. Missouri Pacific R. Co. 409 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Langlois [v. Allied Chemical Corporation, 258 La.
Dofflemyer v. Gilley 384 So. 2d 435 La. 1980
Dofflemyer v. Gilley 378 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
In support of this, argument
Dufrene v. Dixie Auto Ins. Co. 373 So. 2d 162 La. 1979
Sullivan v. Hooker Chemical Co. 370 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Smith v. Castle 361 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
and numerous cases therein cited.
Poe v. State Farm General Ins. Co. 360 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Dupas v. City of New Orleans 354 So. 2d 1311 La. 1978
Failure to anticipate omission of such care does not render the pedestrian negligent as a matter of law.'" See also: Duffy v. Hickey, 151 La.
Evans v. Travelers Insurance 351 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
and authorities therein cited.
White v. Nicosia 351 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
Plauche v. Consolidated Cos., 235 La.
Billiot v. Bourg 338 So. 2d 1148 La. 1976
Peterson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 291 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Our case is analogous to Brantley v. Brown, La.1973, , in which the court concluded that plaintiff youth’s riding on an automobile fender “played no causative role in the accident.” The court summarizes applicable principles of assumption of risk and contributory negligence, stating, in part: “An outrider on a vehicle assumes only such risks as are ordinarily incid
Young v. Grant 290 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
(3rd La.App.1965); (1st La.App.1973)
Martinez v. Parish of East Baton Rouge 288 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
(1st La.App.1967), writ refused, 250 La.
State v. Frezal 278 So. 2d 64 La. 1973
I further realize that, to a certain extent, the present decision is in conflict with that in State v. Moore, La., , because the prejudicial effect of the proof of the prior crime may far outweigh its probative effect.