Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Reed v. Meaux, 292 So. 2d 557.

43 citing documents.

Graystar Mortgage, L.L.C. v. Gregory Swafford as Trustee for the Gregory Swafford Family Trust La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
The Louisiana Supreme Court has recognized a post – (La.
Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Parham 216 So. 3d 231 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Everhome Mortgage Co. v. Lewis 207 So. 3d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Walter Mortgage Co. v. Turner 210 So. 3d 425 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Mary Andree Peltier v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
(Tate, J., on original hearing).
Chase Home Finance, LLC v. Jacob Fox La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
in an effort to demonstrate the protection of rights of a third party purchaser relative to executory proceedings.
Chase Home Finance, LLC v. Fox 150 So. 3d 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
in an effort to demonstrate the protection of rights of a third party purchaser relative to executory proceedings.
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Thompson 142 So. 3d 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
v. Baton Rouge Petroleum Ctr., Inc., -41 (La.1987); -75 (La.1973).
Gulf Coast Bank & Trust Co. v. Warren 125 So. 3d 1211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP v. Thomas 113 So. 3d 355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
However, the supreme court aptly describes the uniquely Louisianain [sic] concept of executory process as “an In rem action derived from the civil law; it provides a simple, expeditious, and inexpensive procedure by which creditors may seize and sell property upon which they enjoy a mortgage or privilege.” Reed , at
First Bank and Trust v. Duwell 70 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. ex rel. Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. v. Carter 59 So. 3d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Knox v. West Baton Rouge Credit, Inc. 9 So. 3d 1020 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Williams v. First Heritage Credit of LA, LLC, 06-1066 (La.App.
AMERICAN THRIFT & FINAN. PLAN v. Richardson 977 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
League Central Credit Union v. Montgomery, 251 La.
Antoine v. Chrysler Financial Corp. 782 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
4th Cir.1983), writ denied, quoting
Lumar v. Mid State Trust II 749 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Lama Trusts 674 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Moore v. Louisiana Bank and Trust Company, supra.
Secor Bank v. Hackle 644 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
the Supreme Court stated commencing at 572: The action to set aside a sale by executory process is not governed by Article 2001 through 2006 of the Code of Civil Procedure prescribing the grounds for nullity of a final judgment.
First Guar. Bk. v. Baton Rouge Petroleum Center, Inc. 529 So. 2d 834 La. 1988
Moore v. Louisiana Bank & Trust Co. 528 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
indicated that any alleged defects in the sale, other than a failure to comply with La.
Bertucci v. Augustine 518 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
PELICAN HOMESTEAD AND SAV. v. Winston 517 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
United Mercantile Bank v. Schwartz 513 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
The supreme court reversed, because two other mortgages were sufficient to support exec-utory process despite the problem with the paraph of the third note and mortgage.
France v. American Bank 505 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Mellon Financial Services Corp. v. Cassreino 499 So. 2d 1160 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Barrios v. Associates Commercial Corp. 481 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
FIRST FEDERAL SAV. AND LOAN ASS'N v. Blake 465 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
at p. 559, and citations therein.
Century Bank v. Melendy 461 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
our Supreme Court held that where one of three mortgages was sufficient to support the grant of executory process the others were mere surplusage and their deficiency had no effect on the executory proceeding.
Plumbing Supply House v. Century Nat. Bank 440 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Gulf National Bank at Lake Charles v. Ryan 432 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
971 , (1968); Blaize, Civil Procedure— Deficiency Judgment After Invalid Exec-utory Process, 29 La.L.Rev.
BANK OF ST. CHARLES, ETC. v. Great So. Coach 424 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
Guillory v. Fontenot 413 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
the Supreme Court held that a sale through executory process can be attacked by means of a direct action, filed after the sale had been recorded by the sheriff, solely on the ground that there were substantive defects in the proceedings which strike at the foundation of the executory proceeding, provided th
Ingram v. Reliable Finance Co., Inc. 410 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
971 , (1968); Blaize, Civil ProcedureDeficiency Judgment After Invalid Executory Process, 29 La.
Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Stout 404 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Fabacher v. Hammond Dairy Co., Inc. 389 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
[13] Reed v. Meaux, La., ; American Budget Plan, Inc. v. Small, La.App., .
Tidwell v. Goston 371 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Brown v. Everding 357 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
Cameron Brown South, Inc. v. East Glen Oaks, Inc. 341 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
See American Bank and *457 Trust Co. in Monroe v. Carson Homes, Inc., (La.App.
Alison Mtg. Inv. Tr. v. COMMERCIAL LEAS & FIN. CO., INC. 334 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Ford Motor Credit Company v. Soileau 323 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
971 , (1968); (La., S.Ct.
Hood Motor Company, Inc. v. Lawrence 320 So. 2d 111 La. 1975
The order is not, however a judgment in any technical sense, Reed v. Meaux, La., (1973), although it is appealable.
Peyrefitte v. Harvey 312 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
(1974) on rehearing; [4] Reid v. Federal Land Bank of New Orleans, 193 La.
National American Bank of New Orleans v. Hosen 323 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1975
See Reed v. Meaux, La., (1973) for discussion of executory process and nullity of judgment.