Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Rabbas, 278 So. 2d 45.

16 citing documents.

State v. Jones 922 So. 2d 508 La. 2006
State v. Brown 849 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
the court considered a prosecution pursuant to La.
State v. Prater 876 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Pri- or decisions of this Court have held that such a defect in the ^proceedings requires remand, and several decisions have even treated jury size as jurisdictional, State v. Reeves, 128 La.
State v. Peace 766 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Becnel 668 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Malloy v. Vanwinkle 662 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
(discussing former La.R.S.
State v. Wiggins 556 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
specifically prohibits the use of such convictions for impeachment purposes.
State v. Boudreaux 526 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Prior decisions of this Court have held that such a defect in the proceedings requires remand, and several decisions have even treated jury size as jurisdictional, State v. Reeves, 128 La.
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Reis 513 So. 2d 1173 La. 1987
State v. Ferguson 474 So. 2d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Rabbas, La., (1973); (1972); State v. Hill, 171 La.
State v. Jenkins 406 So. 2d 1352 La. 1981
State v. Nedds 364 So. 2d 588 La. 1978
State v. Rabbas, La., (1973); (1972); State v. Hill, 171 La.
State v. Gardner 351 So. 2d 105 La. 1977
State v. Stewart 292 So. 2d 677 La. 1974
State v. Martin 290 So. 2d 872 La. 1974
In State v. Rabbas, La., (1973), we held that, under the constitutional provision, a five-man jury was proper when the penalty provision authorized a fine and did not necessarily require imprisonment at hard labor.
State v. Brown 288 So. 2d 339 La. 1974
In brief, defendant abandoned this bill, citing the recent case of State v. Rabbas, La., (1973), which, as the defendant concedes, allows trial by a 5-man jury.