Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Luquette, 275 So. 2d 396.

29 citing documents.

  • State v. Parvez 249 So. 3d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State of Louisiana v. Ashaki Okung Kelly 195 So. 3d 449 La. 2016
  • State v. GRH 10 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    In support of his argument, overruled by State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. G. R. H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    In support of his argument, overruled by State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.
  • State v. Breaux 6 So. 3d 982 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    It is true that the case remained “capital” under the procedural classification of our statutes; however, wherein this court presumed prejudice.
  • State v. Flanagan 724 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Robertson 712 So. 2d 8 La. 1998
    State v. Craighead, 114 La.
  • State v. Smith 687 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    Similarly, the court set aside a conviction based on the failure of the trial judge to sequester the jurors after some of them were sworn, but before the entire jury was chosen.
  • State v. Taylor 669 So. 2d 364 La. 1996
    State v. Craighead, 114 La.
  • State v. Jones 525 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Schrader 518 So. 2d 1024 La. 1988
  • State v. Miller 391 So. 2d 1159 La. 1980
    in which this court stated: "Many years ago a rule was established by this Court designed to offer the greatest security to the accused, and at the same time to trench in no wise upon any right necessary to insure the due and proper execution of the law.
  • State v. Franks 391 So. 2d 1133 La. 1980
  • State v. Parker 372 So. 2d 1037 La. 1979
    State v. Craighead, 114 La.
  • State v. Rich 368 So. 2d 1083 La. 1979
  • State v. Henson 351 So. 2d 1169 La. 1977
  • State v. Keys 346 So. 2d 169 La. 1977
  • State v. McDaniel 340 So. 2d 242 La. 1976
  • State v. Burnette 337 So. 2d 1096 La. 1976
    State v. Luquette, La., (1973).
  • State v. Martin 329 So. 2d 688 La. 1976
  • State v. Lott 325 So. 2d 576 La. 1976
    we decided that a defendant could not waive the requirement, in a murder case, that the jury be sequestered.
  • State v. Nix 327 So. 2d 301 La. 1975
    State v. Johnson, 249 La.
  • State v. Williams 322 So. 2d 177 La. 1975
    State v. Palmer, 251 La.
  • State v. Smith 322 So. 2d 197 La. 1975
  • State v. Oliveaux 312 So. 2d 337 La. 1975
  • State v. Hunter 306 So. 2d 710 La. 1975
    The mandatory sequestration of jurors in capital cases was explained, Justice *711 Summers the organ of this Court, (1973): "Many years ago a rule was established by this Court designed to offer the greatest security to the accused, and at the same time to trench in no wise upon any right necessary to insure the due and proper execution of the law.
  • State v. Craddock 307 So. 2d 342 La. 1975
  • State v. Bradford 298 So. 2d 781 La. 1974
  • State v. Stewart 292 So. 2d 677 La. 1974