Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Landry v. Ferguson, 279 So. 2d 185.

17 citing documents.

Norman v. Bellsouth Telecommunications 888 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Dupaquier v. City of New Orleans, 260 La.
Scott v. Walmart Stores, Inc. 851 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Blanchard v. Tulane Medical Center, 97-1111 (La.App.
Muhammad v. New Orleans Police Department 822 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 3/16/76), we stated that: A statement by the employer’s representative that the employee has no valid claim is entirely different from one that the employee will be taken care of (as in Landry v. Ferguson, La., (1973)) or one that compensation will be paid without suit.
Richardson v. Tyson Foods 796 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Millican v. General Motors Corp. 771 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Wesley, supra ; Blanchard v. Tulane Medical Center, 97-1111 (La.App.
Causby v. Perque Floor Covering 707 So. 2d 23 La. 1998
Causby v. Perque Floor Covering 694 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
762 , (1966); Dupaquier v. City of New Orleans, 260 La.
Williams v. William Wrigley, Jr. Co. 646 So. 2d 1092 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
762 , (1966); Dupaquier v. City of New Orleans, 260 La.
Baker v. Grinnell Fire Protection Systems, Inc. 487 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
7, 1966; Dupaquier v. City of New Orleans, 260 La.
Fontenot v. Houston General Insurance Co. 467 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
App. 2 Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.
Foster v. Manville Forest Products Corp. 465 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Dupaquier v. City of New Orleans, supra .
Wesley v. Claiborne Elec. Co-Op, Inc. 446 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Dupaquier v. City of New Orleans, 260 La.
Miller v. Olinkraft, Inc. 395 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
[3] the Louisiana Supreme Court held: "An employer who lulls an injured employee into a false sense of security by promising to `take care' of him cannot later interpose a plea of prescription to the plaintiff's untimely suit for workmen's compensation benefits...."
Lester v. Rebel Crane & Service Co. 381 So. 2d 1318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
in support of his position that an employer who lulls an injured employee into a false sense of security thereby causing him to forgo timely prosecution of his claim for workmen’s compensation payments cannot then rely' on prescription as a defense to plaintiff’s claims.
Sewell v. Argonaut-Southwest Ins. Co. 338 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
7, 1966; Dupaquier v. City of New Orleans, 260 La.
Smith v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. 334 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
3 Cir. 1972), reversed on other grounds
Drane v. City of New Orleans 328 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
A statement by the employer's representative that the employee has no valid claim is entirely different from one that the employee will be taken care of [as in Landry v. Ferguson, La., (1973)], or one that compensation will be paid without suit.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by