Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Juan v. Harris, 279 So. 2d 187.

15 citing documents.

Distinguished Shaffer v. Stewart Const. Co., Inc. 865 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
and that the clauses in these two insurance policies are not mutually repugnant.
Citgo Petroleum Corp. v. Yeargin, Inc. 690 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
[2] and O'Brien v. Traders & General Ins.
Chedville v. Insurance Co. of North America 664 So. 2d 1310 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
dealt with facts and policy provisions that were virtually identical to those in Thomas and reached the same result.
Lewis v. Hamilton 652 So. 2d 1327 La. 1995
Frois v. Bullock 639 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
679, 682-83 (E.D.La.1981) (-190 (La.1973), and O'Brien v. Traders & General Ins.
Lewis v. Hamilton 638 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
on its behalf for the position that Titan’s upoligy provides only excess coverage for nonowned autos.
Bell v. Farmer's Ins. Group 635 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Penton v. Hotho 601 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Woodson v. A & M Investments, Inc. 591 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Schroeder v. DiPascal Cabinet Co., Inc. 467 So. 2d 1380 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
App. 4th Cir.1972); affirmed and amended on other grounds, Arrow Fence Co., (La.App.
Arrow Fence Co. v. DeFrancesch 466 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
4th Cir.1972); affirmed and amended on other grounds
Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. 434 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
4th Cir.1973), affirmed and amended, wherein effect was given to excess clause of one insurance policy over pro rata clause of another policy which was held to be clearly primary.
Koncinsky v. Smith 390 So. 2d 1377 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
4th Cir. 1972) affirmed and amended on further grounds, (La.App.
Blanchard v. Rodrigue 340 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Juan v. Harris, La., (1973).
Thomas v. Neeb-Kearney & Co. 334 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
An almost identical situation with identical insurance clauses was decided in this manner by the Louisiana Supreme Court in *467 (1973).