Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Moore, 278 So. 2d 781.

104 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Joseph Taylor 217 So. 3d 283 La. 2016
State v. Reed 1 So. 3d 561 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Taylor, 37,356 (La.App.2d Cir.9/26/03), , writ denied, 03-3141 (La.3/19/04), ; State v. Carter, 97-1096 (La.App.
State v. Reed 1 So. 3d 561 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Taylor, 37,356 (La.App.2d Cir.9/26/03), , unit denied, 03-3141 (La.3/19/04), ; State v. Carter, 97-1096 (La.App.
State v. Colbert 990 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Mathieu 980 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. James Allen Drake, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Drake 903 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Dykes 867 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State of Louisiana v. William Odell Cash La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Cash 861 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Maise 805 So. 2d 1141 La. 2002
(Dixon, J., dissenting) (discussing [ State v. ] Moore [, ]).
State v. Morgan 791 So. 2d 100 La. 2001
State v. Kennedy 803 So. 2d 916 La. 2001
State v. Hills 737 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
art. 1103 provided: Article 404(B) and 104(A) neither codifies nor affects the law of other crimes evidence, and their progeny, as regards the notice requirement and the clear and convincing evidence standard in regard to other crimes evidence.
State v. McArthur 719 So. 2d 1037 La. 1998
State v. Clark 687 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Sterling 670 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Ham 652 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
art. 1103: "Article 404(B) and 104(A) neither codifies nor affects the law of other crimes evidence, and their progeny, as regards the notice requirement and the clear and convincing evidence standard in regard to other crimes evidence.
State v. Broussard 649 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Dixon 628 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Jackson 625 So. 2d 146 La. 1993
State v. Griffin 618 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
This article neither codifies nor affects the law of other crimes evidence, and their progeny.
State v. Plater 606 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
404(B)(1), 403; (on rehearing).
State v. Tucker 602 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
art. 1103 further provides with respect to the admissibility of other crimes evidence as follows: Article 404(B) and 104(A) neither codifies nor affects the law of other crimes evidence, and their progeny, as regards the notice requirement and the clear and convincing evidence standard in regard to other crimes evidence.
State v. Lee 569 So. 2d 1038 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State v. Jackson 545 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Burk v. Illinois Cent. Gulf RR Co. 529 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Schwamb v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. 516 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Caldwell 504 So. 2d 853 La. 1987
State v. Ludwig, supra, at 1078
State v. Bowie 458 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Horton 458 So. 2d 445 La. 1984
State v. Kelly 456 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Armstrong 453 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Parker 436 So. 2d 495 La. 1983
State v. Germain 433 So. 2d 110 La. 1983
-87 (La.1972) (On Rehearing 1973); State v. Prieur, supra; R.S.
State v. Ducote 433 So. 2d 712 La. 1983
State v. Brown 428 So. 2d 438 La. 1983
State v. Ludwig 423 So. 2d 1073 La. 1982
State v. Humphrey 412 So. 2d 507 La. 1982
See State v. Prieur , above; (La.
State v. Goza 408 So. 2d 1349 La. 1982
State v. Acliese 403 So. 2d 665 La. 1981
State v. Day 400 So. 2d 622 La. 1981
State v. James 396 So. 2d 1281 La. 1981
State v. James 394 So. 2d 1197 La. 1981
State v. Constantine, supra; State v. Herman, supra; (La.
State v. Walker 394 So. 2d 1181 La. 1981
State v. Cann 392 So. 2d 381 La. 1981
State v. Davis 389 So. 2d 71 La. 1980
State v. Martin 377 So. 2d 259 La. 1979
State v. Abercrombie 375 So. 2d 1170 La. 1979
Intent was also not a "real and genuine issue", because the defendant contended that he had not done the act at all, *1175 not that he had not had the requisite intent.
State v. Hatcher 372 So. 2d 1024 La. 1979
State v. Jackson, supra ; (on rehearing).