Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Marcus v. Burnett, 282 So. 2d 122.
-
Ouber v. Ouber
359 So. 2d 688
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
” Considering all of the above circumstances and the applicable law, we are of the opinion that the award of $350.00 per month child support is so excessive as to constitute a breach of the discretion afforded the trial judge in cases of this nature.
- Savoie v. Curtis 354 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
- LaBalle v. LaBalle 352 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
- Laballe v. Massel 352 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
-
Powell v. Powell
344 So. 2d 453
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
and cases discussed therein.
-
Aura v. Aura
342 So. 2d 1200
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
has been cited by both appellants.
- Ducote v. Ducote 331 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
- Parent v. Parent 327 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
-
LeBouef v. LeBouef
325 So. 2d 290
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
art. 231; Marcus v. Burnett, La., (1973).
- Gennaro v. Gennaro 323 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
- Swider v. Swider 314 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
-
Nicolle v. Nicolle
308 So. 2d 377
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
(S.Ct.1973) for the proposition that the expenses incurred by the divorced husband for the support of the children of his new wife by a previous marriage are to be considered in setting child support.
- Finley v. Finley 305 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
-
Holloway v. Holloway
296 So. 2d 435
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
3 , , amended on other grounds, La., (1973).
-
Porter v. Cooley
293 So. 2d 258
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
In the recent case of Marcus v. Burnett, La., (1973) our Supreme Court held that where the child is in the custody of the mother and the father has remarried, the expenses of the second marriage of the father may be considered as one of the circumstances in determining his ability to pay child support for the child of the first marriage.
-
Johnson v. Johnson
293 So. 2d 213
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
(1973), in ascertaining the proper amount of child support, the totality of the pertinent circumstances of the father and the mother as well, are to be considered.
- Kees v. Kees 292 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974