DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Scott, 278 So. 2d 121.

18 citing documents.

  • State v. Griffin 167 So. 3d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Castillo 167 So. 3d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Mills 153 So. 3d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Mitchell, 08-136 (La.App.
  • State v. Mitchell 7 So. 3d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Anderson 561 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Potts 554 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    art. 1, § 13 (1974); (La.App.
  • State v. Kalathakis 543 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    and, - at the same time, requirements for drafting the indictment should not create technical traps for district attorneys.”
  • State v. Campbell 345 So. 2d 1171 La. 1977
  • State v. Jewell 345 So. 2d 1166 La. 1977
    -27 (La.1973), and State v. Welkner, 259 La.
  • State v. Winston 343 So. 2d 171 La. 1977
    ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NO. 2 Here, defense counsel complains that the trial court improperly refused to allow him to examine former Deputy Hebert regarding the deputy's use of one Elray Fontenot as an informer in the unrelated case of State v. Scott, La., (1973).
  • State v. Anderson 343 So. 2d 135 La. 1977
    State v. Clouatre, 262 La.
  • State v. James 339 So. 2d 741 La. 1976
    State v. James, La., (1974); State v. Scott, La., (1973).
  • Distinguished State v. Clark 338 So. 2d 690 La. 1976
  • State v. Malmay 315 So. 2d 286 La. 1975
    In the instant case, the State does not even charge a "willful" *289 or "unlawful" act
  • State v. Frank 310 So. 2d 110 La. 1975
    Art. 878; State v. Scott, La., (1973).
  • State v. Santos 309 So. 2d 129 La. 1975
    also 127 (concurring opinion) (La.1973).
  • State v. Thorson 302 So. 2d 578 La. 1974
    The bill merely states that the defendant did "wilfully and unlawfully" possess LSD with intent to distribute it, whereas the statute proscribes the knowing and intentional possession; however, the information is sufficient.
  • State v. Davis 278 So. 2d 130 La. 1973
    I respectfully dissent for the reasons assigned in my dissenting opinion in State v. Scott, La., , this day decided.