Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Douglas, 278 So. 2d 485.

131 citing documents.

State v. Kaufman 331 So. 2d 16 La. 1976
State v. Matthews 329 So. 2d 678 La. 1976
State v. Chase 327 So. 2d 391 La. 1976
State v. Brown 326 So. 2d 839 La. 1976
State v. Credeur 328 So. 2d 59 La. 1976
State v. Walker 328 So. 2d 87 La. 1976
State v. O'NEAL 328 So. 2d 100 La. 1976
State v. House 325 So. 2d 222 La. 1976
State v. Daniels 326 So. 2d 340 La. 1976
State v. Calloway 324 So. 2d 801 La. 1976
State v. Howard 325 So. 2d 812 La. 1976
State v. Wilkerson 326 So. 2d 353 La. 1976
State v. Douglas, La., (1973).
State v. Clark 325 So. 2d 802 La. 1976
State v. Alford 323 So. 2d 788 La. 1975
State v. Willis 325 So. 2d 227 La. 1975
we stated that a directed verdict of acquittal is proper only where the state has produced no evidence of the commission of the crime or an essential element thereof.
State v. Larue 324 So. 2d 384 La. 1975
State v. Rogers 324 So. 2d 358 La. 1975
State v. Ricks 323 So. 2d 458 La. 1975
La.Code Criminal Procedure art. 778
State v. McFarland 321 So. 2d 322 La. 1975
State v. Coleman 322 So. 2d 195 La. 1975
State v. Youngblood 321 So. 2d 333 La. 1975
In State v. Douglas, La., (1973), we held that the language of Article 778 allowing a directed verdict of not guilty after the close of the State’s evidence “if the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction” refers to those cases in which the prosecution has produced no evidence to prove the crime or an essential element thereof.
State v. McGhee 321 So. 2d 328 La. 1975
State v. King 322 So. 2d 205 La. 1975
State v. Roach 322 So. 2d 222 La. 1975
we held that the defendant may be granted a directed verdict of acquittal only when the state has produced no evidence to prove a crime or an essential element thereof.
State v. West 319 So. 2d 901 La. 1975
State v. Douglas, La., (1973).
State v. Weathers 320 So. 2d 892 La. 1975
State v. Scott 320 So. 2d 538 La. 1975
State v. Madison 319 So. 2d 912 La. 1975
State v. Cann 319 So. 2d 396 La. 1975
State v. Cloud 319 So. 2d 793 La. 1975
State v. Lockett 319 So. 2d 420 La. 1975
State v. Martin 319 So. 2d 383 La. 1975
State v. Nunez 319 So. 2d 765 La. 1975
this court has held that it is only in cases where there is no evidence of the crime or of an essential element thereof that this court has the power to find meritorious a motion for directed verdict and reverse a conviction.
State v. Burgy 320 So. 2d 175 La. 1975
State v. Foret, La., (1975) State v. Patterson, La., (1974); State v. Douglas, La., (1973).
State v. Dillard 320 So. 2d 116 La. 1975
State v. Brumfield 319 So. 2d 402 La. 1975
State v. Douglas, La., (1973).
State v. Hines 319 So. 2d 313 La. 1975
State v. Dixon 316 So. 2d 737 La. 1975
State v. Evans 317 So. 2d 168 La. 1975
construed the phrase "insufficient to sustain a conviction" to mean that "the prosecution has produced no evidence to prove a crime or an essential element" thereof.
State v. Sonnier 317 So. 2d 190 La. 1975
we held that the quoted phrase referred to a situation where the prosecutor has produced no evidence to prove a crime or an essential element thereof.
State v. Monk 315 So. 2d 727 La. 1975
State v. Ford 315 So. 2d 276 La. 1975
State v. Barber 315 So. 2d 296 La. 1975
State v. Foret 315 So. 2d 278 La. 1975
State v. Nance 315 So. 2d 695 La. 1975
He relies upon Article 778 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure and State v. Douglas, La., (1973), and asserts that "the record *703 is totally devoid of any evidence connecting defendant with the alleged crime."
State v. Hamilton 312 So. 2d 656 La. 1975
State v. Senegal 312 So. 2d 280 La. 1975
State v. Williams 311 So. 2d 850 La. 1975
State v. Fluker 311 So. 2d 863 La. 1975
State v. Elam 312 So. 2d 318 La. 1975