Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.

2744 citing documents.

Succession of Vernon James Goudeau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2026
Andrew McBride and Ginger McBride v. Rafael Lara Construction, LLC La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Justin Irwin v. John Bradley Brent La. 2025
or this well- settled principle of review is based not only upon the trial court’s better capacity to evaluate live witnesses (as compared with the appellate court’s access only to a cold record), but also upon the proper allocation of trial and appellate functions between the respective courts.”
Kenneth Prevost v. City of New Orleans Fire Department La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
Stobart, 617 So.2d at 883 ( (La.
Andres Braud v. Kathy Bernstein and Marc Bernstein La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
Amerifactors Financial Group, LLC v. Dunham Price Group, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
but also upon the proper allocation of trial and appellate functions between the respective courts.”
Janet Thymes v. Golden Nugget Lake Charles, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Charles E. Barker Versus Anco Insulations, Inc. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
12/14/01), 22-CA-417 2 (La.
John David Dean v. Christie Lynn Burkeen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
This principle is grounded not only upon the better capacity of the trial court to evaluate live witnesses, rather than a cold record on appeal, “but also upon the proper allocation of trial and appellate functions between the respective courts.”
Scott Clover v. Redfish Rentals, Inc. and Summit La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Additionally, an appellate court cannot reverse a WCJ’s factual findings that are based on a reasonable credibility evaluation if the record “furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding[.]” Marange, 93 So.3d at 1258 ().
Timothy H. Mullenix v. George R. Mullenix La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
Stephen K. Lentz v. City of New Orleans, Police Department La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Brett Buckner v. Dialysis Clinics, Inc. (Dci) La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Additionally, an appellate court cannot reverse a WCJ's factual findings that are based on a reasonable credibility evaluation if the record “furnishes [a] reasonable factual basis for the trial court's finding.” Marange, 93 So.3d at 1258 ().
Patricia Matthews v. Big Easy Janitorial, L.L.C., and Louisiana Construction and Industry Self Insurers Fund La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Mark Anthony Lafleur v. Catherine Ann Reed Lafleur La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Saraphine Green v. Breaux Bridge Ventures, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
This court has recognized that “[t]he reason for this well-settled principle of review is based not only upon the trial court’s better capacity to evaluate live witnesses (as compared with the appellate court’s access only to a cold record), but also upon the proper allocation of trial and appellate functions between the respective courts.” [724] (La.1973).
Sharon Guillory Christie v. Jeffrey Chad Christie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Lakeisha Mills, Felicity Mitchell, Roberta Ross, Natasha Graves, Ashley Suez, Kaleen Moses, Kathy Barbay, Jennifer Gaffney, And Adlai … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Belton and Rami can be held personally liable for breaching their employment duties, ( La.
Lakeisha Mills, Felicity Mitchell, Roberta Ross, Natasha Graves, Ashley Suez, Kaleen Moses, Kathy Barbay, Jennifer Gaffney, And Adlai … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Belton and Rami can be held personally liable for breaching their employment duties, ( La.
Philip Adam Thomas v. Kelly Jean Willis Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Succession of Victor Edward Robinson Bradley, Jr. A/K/A Victor E. Bradley, Jr. A/K/A Vic Bradley, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
n for this well-settled principle of review is based not only upon the trial court’s better capacity to evaluate live witnesses (as compared with the appellate court’s access only to a cold record), but also upon the proper 20-CA-168 6 allocation of trial and appellate functions between the respective courts.” (La.
Bruce Breaux v. Jackie Woods La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
William Vance v. International House of Pancakes,llc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
3/23/01), ( superseded by statute as stated in Walls v. Am.
Taylor v. City of Alexandria 274 So. 3d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Canter v. Koehring Co. , , 724 (La.1973).
Dawn Nolen v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
but also upon the proper allocation of trial and appellate functions between the respective courts.”
Jennifer Mayfield and Bendal Mayfield v. Thomas W. Fothergill La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
“The reason for this well-settled principle of review is based not only upon the trial 2 court’s better capacity to evaluate live witnesses (as compared with the appellate court’s access only to a cold record), but also upon the proper allocation of trial and appellate functions between the respective courts.”
Haygood v. Haygood 264 So. 3d 1226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
1/27/95), , citing Canter v. Koehring Co. (La.
First Bank & Trust v. Treme 262 So. 3d 1050 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1989) ; Canter v. Koehring Co. , , 724 (La.
Ammar Invs., LLC v. Certain Underwriters Lloyd's 261 So. 3d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1989) ; Canter v. Koehring Co. , , 724 (La.
Bowling v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 261 So. 3d 1014 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Patrick Bowling v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Vince ex rel. Southland Express, LLC v. Metro Rediscount Co. 259 So. 3d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In re State 257 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2018
Canter v. Koehring Company , , 724 (La.
India Sam, as Curatrix for Jessica Charles v. Genesis Behavioral Hospital, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Sam v. Genesis Behavioral Hosp., Inc. 255 So. 3d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Roger Burchfield and Carol Burchfield v. Forrest H. Wright, M.D., Thomas Renda, M.D., and Willis Knighton Medical Center 275 So. 3d 855 La. 2018
Lafayette General Medical Center,inc. v. Richard Hill La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Patterson v. Patterson 247 So. 3d 1148 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Powell , supra , citing Canter v. Koehring Co. , (La.
Michael Albarado, Individually v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Albarado v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 247 So. 3d 818 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Rosell v. ESCO , , 844 (La.1989) ; Canter v. Koehring Co. , , 724 (La.1973).
Gettys v. Gettys 247 So. 3d 1133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Canter v. Koehring Co. , , 724 (La.1973) Accordingly, this Court will not disturb the trial court's factual findings because we do not find that the trial court abused its discretion.
William Terry Ebarb and Dewanna N. Ebarb v. Unopened Succ. of Alfair Jones Sepulvado La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Norman Michael Sepulvado v. William Terry Ebarb La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Ebarb v. Unopened Succession Sepulvado 241 So. 3d 1103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Rosell v. ESCO , , 844 (La.1989) ; Canter v. Koehring Co. , , 724 (La.
Succession of Mary Lou Thrasher La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
“The reason for this well-settled principle of review is based not only upon the trial court’s better capacity to evaluate live witnesses (as compared with the appellate court’s access only to a cold record), but also upon the proper allocation of trial and appellate functions between the respective courts.”
Emma Bradford v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Bradford v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 237 So. 3d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Marguerite Fugler Cardwell v. Oaks Care Center, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Cardwell v. Oaks Care Ctr., LLC 258 So. 3d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
844 (La.1989) ; *728 , 724 (La.1973).
Ragen H. Borel v. James I. Borel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017