Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.

2744 citing documents.

State Department of Social Services v. Jackson 726 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Vendetto v. Sonat Offshore Drilling Co. 725 So. 2d 474 La. 1999
Brown v. Seimers 726 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Calais Square Ltd. v. LeDoux 722 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Lewis v. Barnes 722 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Granger v. Granger 722 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Harrison v. State 721 So. 2d 458 La. 1998
Perret v. Nelson 722 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Stobart v. State, Through DOTD, at 883 (La.1993)
Minton v. Crawford 719 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Daye v. General Motors Corp. 720 So. 2d 654 La. 1998
Collins v. Magnolia Marketing Co. 717 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Carter v. Dixie Electric Membership Corp. 717 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Harrison v. Frank & Janie Seafood Rest. 718 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
In Re Succession of Steckler 712 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Robling v. Allstate Ins. Co. 711 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Manso v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 708 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
LeBlanc v. Chateau Riviere Home for Aged, Inc. 708 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Boutte v. Langston Companies, Inc. 707 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
O'RILEY v. City of Shreveport 706 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Dragon v. Schultz 707 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Royal v. Cottles 705 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Dual Drilling Co. v. MILLS EQUIPMENT INVS., INC. 705 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Bostwick v. MAPP Industries, Inc. 707 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Riley v. Reliance Ins. Co. 703 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Johnson v. Black & Decker US, Inc. 701 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Guillory v. Guillory 702 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Pugh v. Mayeaux 702 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
1989), we synthesized the "manifest error" and "clearly wrong" (La.
Mann v. Zurich Ins. Co. 702 So. 2d 960 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Thomasie v. Lee 700 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
DeGeorge v. Gilley 701 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Shephard on Behalf of Shephard v. Scheeler 701 So. 2d 1308 La. 1997
In Virgil, we stated: as follows: "...
Nalle v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 702 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Walker v. McCartney 700 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Ruiz v. Oniate 697 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Mullins v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 697 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Stobart v. State, Department of Transportation and Development
Gautreau v. Gautreau 697 So. 2d 1339 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Powell v. Regional Transit Authority 695 So. 2d 1326 La. 1997
Lee v. Magnolia Garden Apartments 694 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Rosell, 549 So.2d at 844
Dronet v. Dronet 694 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Guillory v. Ins. Co. of North America 692 So. 2d 1029 La. 1997
to require deference to the fact findings of the trial court, whether judge or jury.
Dixie Parking Service, Inc. v. Hargrove 691 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Lejeune v. Union Pacific Railroad 693 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Theriot v. Bourg 691 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Gulf States Section v. Whitney Nat. Bank 689 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Lobue v. Simco Industries, Inc. 690 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Smith v. Regional Transit Authority 689 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Stroik v. Ponseti 683 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Laurents v. Louisiana Mobile Homes, Inc. 689 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
the supreme court set forth the circumstances under which an officer, agent, or employee is liable to a third person damaged solely by reason of the individual's breach of an employment-imposed duty: 1.
Williamson v. Haynes Best Western 688 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Succession of Pruitt 688 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
“In reviewing the factual findings of a trial court, an appellate court is limited to a determination of manifest error.” on remand (La.App.