Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.

2744 citing documents.

Turner v. Massiah 641 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Gilchrist v. Ozone Spring Water Co. 639 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Moore v. Gencorp, Inc. 641 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Rhodes v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 638 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Menard v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 640 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Fleming v. Smith 638 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Smith v. LOUISIANA HEALTH & HUMAN RES. 637 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Henning Const. v. First Eastern Bank 635 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Jones v. Trailor 636 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
[4] The *1123 criteria for "executive officer"
Lee v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 635 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
This court has recognized that “[t]he reason for this well-settled principle of review is based not only upon the trial court’s better capacity to evaluate live wit *562 nesses (as compared with the appellate court’s access only to a cold record), but also upon the proper allocation of trial and appellate functions between the respective courts.”
Fontenot v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF EDUC. 635 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Dismuke v. Quaynor 637 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Langlinais v. Figueroa 636 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
This court has recognized that “[t]he reason for this well-settled principle of review is based not only upon the trial court’s better capacity to evaluate live witnesses (as compared with the appellate court’s access only to a cold record), but also upon the proper allocation of trial and appellate functions between the respective courts.”
Smith v. Dow Chemical Co. 635 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
which provides the following four-part test: 1.
Butler v. Zapata Haynie Corp. 633 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Winingder v. Balmer 632 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
ACCREDITED SUR. & CAS. v. McElveen 631 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
1978); and their progeny factual determinations of the trial court are reversible only if found to be manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong.
Fletcher v. Langley 631 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Foster v. Varnado 631 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
we have reviewed the evidence before the trial court and do not find that a reasonable factual basis exists for the finding upon which the trial court based its judgment against Ronald Alexander.
Sanders v. Wysocki 631 So. 2d 1330 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Spurrell v. Ivey 630 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Hines v. Remington Arms Co., Inc. 630 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Gaston v. G & D Marine Services, Inc. 631 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Adams v. Caddo Parish School Bd. 631 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Quinones v. US Fidelity and Guaranty Co. 630 So. 2d 1303 La. 1994
Cay v. STATE, DOTD 631 So. 2d 393 La. 1994
1978); Sevier v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.
Gallow v. Jack Eckerd Corp. 630 So. 2d 970 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Oalmann v. K-Mart Corp. 630 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Butler v. Cantrell 630 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Kelley v. Louisiana Limestone Aggregates, Inc. 630 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Huval Baking Co., Inc. v. Fontenot 629 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
& Liability Ins., in this case, there exists no evidence which could justify the hearing officer's *435 decision.
Succession of Garcia 628 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Since Ms. Garlick’s judgment is not for “back pay”, or for a salary for a period of employment, but rather for a professional fee, we find the trial court’s
First Page v. Network Paging Corp. 628 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
There was testimony by Groome's former employee JoAnn Thane that Battaglia told her of a fee splitting arrangement between Hayes and Battaglia during the time Hayes was employed by Network and Battaglia by Groome.
Vincent v. Hyundai Corp. 633 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dept. 627 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Board of Com'rs v. Missouri Pacific R. Co. 625 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Hebert v. Louisiana Health Service Indemnity Co. 626 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
governs our evaluation of the trial record, whether it consists of live testimony, written reports, records, depositions or a combination of these.
Frederick v. Woman's Hosp. of Acadiana 626 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Richard v. Comeaux 626 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Sercovich v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. 626 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Goins v. Galion Mfg. Co. 626 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Feigler v. Transit Management of Southeast Louisiana, Inc. 626 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Lavergne v. Lake Charles Memorial Hosp. 625 So. 2d 1098 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Norfleet v. Southern Baptist Hospital 623 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Trammel v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co. 637 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
This court has recognized that ‘[t]he reason for this well-settled principle of review is based not only upon the trial court’s better capacity to evaluate live witnesses *520 (as compared with the appellate court’s access only to a cold record), but also upon the proper allocation of trial and appellate functions between the respective courts.’
Austin v. St. Charles General Hospital 621 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Finally, clearly the Fund cannot substitute its ideas for the findings and final judgment of a trial court.
Edenfield v. Vahid 621 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
However, our Supreme Court in a recent decision, Larry Joe Virgil v. American Guaranty and Liability Insurance Company, et al., (La.
Ware v. Medical Protective Ins. Co. 621 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Romero v. Gary 619 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Broussard v. Domingue 619 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993