Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.

2744 citing documents.

New Orleans v. United Gas Pipe Line Co. 517 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Clomes v. T.R. Henning Co. 510 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Domino v. Matthews 508 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Anderson v. Fowler Trucking, Inc. 506 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
1978), on remand , writ denied (La.
Worley v. Thirdkill 506 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Followed Wahden v. Sanders 507 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
With regard to the testimony adduced at trial, and its progeny.
Montoya v. Tallieu 508 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Brumbaugh v. Marathon Oil Co. 507 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Bankston v. Gregory & Cook, Inc. 506 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Johnson v. City of Baton Rouge 506 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Genina Marine Services, Inc. v. Mobil Exploration & Production Southeast, Inc. 506 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
*930 “Where there is credible evidence before the trier of fact, which furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s conclusion, an appellate court should not reverse unless the trial court is clearly wrong.” Boulos, supra, at 3
Weston v. Bayou Sale Contractors, Inc. 506 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Louisiana Fuel Systems, Inc. v. Wigginton 506 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Hill v. Lamulle 506 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Seaux v. Domingue 509 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Goutierrez v. R & J Quarterhorse Stables 509 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Deville v. Port Pipe Terminal of Louisiana, Inc., (La.App.
Borne v. Wilander 509 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Succession of Erbelding 509 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Crochet v. Pritchard 509 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Robert v. Albarado 509 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Black Rogers & Co. v. Pope 504 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Bolin v. Gulf Oil Corp. 504 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Suhren v. Suhren 505 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
4th Cir.1976).” The appellate court will not disturb the findings of fact of the trial court unless the findings are “clearly wrong.”
Explained Legnon v. McDonald 505 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
is that even though the Appellate Court may feel that its own evaluations and inferences are as reasonable, it should not disturb reasonable findings of the trial court where there is conflict in the testimony.
Aldrich v. Aldrich 505 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Prejean v. Commonwealth for Community Change, Inc. 503 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Capps v. Brashear 504 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Harris v. Steele 506 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Hines v. Dept. of Transp. & Development 503 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Brownell v. Dietz Motor Lines 503 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Boulos v. Morrison 503 So. 2d 1 La. 1987
The standard of appellate review of a
Truschinger v. Pak 503 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Dutton & Vaughn, Inc. v. Blaine-Hays Construction Co. 503 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Gordon v. Commercial Union Insurance Company 503 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Hammer v. Combre 503 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Hellmers v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT 503 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
In re Terry 503 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Schexnayder v. Schexnayder 503 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Harrison v. Harrison 503 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Levine v. Brailey 502 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Derouen v. Derouen 502 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Blair v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 502 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Heard v. Bonnie and Clyde's of Hattiesburg, Inc. 501 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Faust v. Toole 502 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
The trial court’s determination of witnesses’
Boudreaux v. Leininger 502 So. 2d 1108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Short v. Otis Elevator Co. 502 So. 2d 1100 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Stone v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 501 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that: [wjhen there is evidence before the trier of fact which upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manife
South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 501 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Castjohn v. Hepplewhite Homes, Inc. 501 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Canter v. Koehring Co. Following the foregoing jurisprudence, we do not find that the trial judge committed manifest error in his determination that plaintiffs did not prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence.
Sparacello v. Andrews 501 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by