Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.

2744 citing documents.

Hebert v. First Guar. Bank 493 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Laird v. Payne & Keller, Inc. 491 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Mercer v. Fruehauf Corp. 492 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company
Foreman v. Saucier 491 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Mayeux v. Commercial Union Insurance Companies 492 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
states that: “[T]he reviewing court must give great weight to the factual conclusions of the trier of fact; where there is conflict in testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbed upon review, even though the appellate court may feel that its
Keith v. Bearden 488 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
McNamara v. John E. Chance & Associates, Inc. 491 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Lambert v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 490 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
The reason for this well-settled principle of review is based not only upon the trial court’s better capacity to evaluate live witnesses (as compared with the appellate court’s access only to a cold record), but also upon the proper allocation of trial and appellate functions between the respective courts.” , at page 724 (La.1973).
Cayard v. Exquisito Food Service, Inc. 492 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
[The reason for this well-settled principle of review is based not only upon the trial court’s better capacity to evaluate live witnesses (as compared with the appellate court’s access only to a cold record), but also upon the proper allocation of trial and appellate functions between the respective courts....]”
Lancaster v. Petroleum Corp. of Delaware 491 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Gashio 491 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
In order to reverse or modify the judgment, : When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.
White v. Givens 491 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Sara, Inc. v. Southeastern Aviation (Texas) Inc. 490 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Prest v. State Dept. of Transp. 490 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Curtis v. Roman Catholic Church of Archdiocese of New Orleans 490 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
SESSIONS, FISHMAN, ROSENSON, ETC. v. Taddonio 490 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Reed v. Verwoerdt 490 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Puderer v. Gonzales 490 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
this Court is going to dismiss the suit for personal injuries filed by Mr. Purderer [sic] and this court renders a judgment in favor of Louis C. Gonzales and Leader National Insurance Company.” On appeal, the standard of review to be applied on factual issues, is whether the trial court was manifestly erroneous; in other words, clearly wrong in its factual determination, and their progency.
Duckworth v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 490 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Cenac v. Cenac 492 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Eaglin v. State Farm Insurance Co. 489 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc. 488 So. 2d 999 La. 1986
Douglas v. Thomas 489 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Franklin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 488 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Bellard v. Commercial Union Insurance Co. 489 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Roy v. Phelps 488 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Hatch v. Acadiana Bank & Trust Co. 488 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Jolivette v. Highland Insurance Co. 488 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Sonnier v. Aetna Life & Casualty 488 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
” Arteck Services v. Crownpoint Industries, Inc., (La.App.
Toce Oil Co. v. Central Industries, Inc. 488 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Broussard v. Zim's Alignment Service, Inc. 488 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
“Where there is no evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.” -724 (La.
Luneau v. Guillory 489 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
: “When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.
Johnson v. Georgia Cas. & Sur. Co. 488 So. 2d 1306 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Ducote v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. 488 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Fitzgerald v. Gulf Intern. Cinema Corp. 489 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Riley v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 489 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Jones v. Crescent City Health & Racquetball Club 489 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Poe v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 488 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Richard v. A-1 Industries, Inc. 489 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Francois v. Tufts 491 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Prothro v. Dillahunty 488 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Butts v. Cummings 488 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
German v. Andries 487 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Raymond v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 487 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Prudhomme v. Mervine Kahn Co. 487 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
It is apparent that the trial court did not believe Prud-homme’s assertion that he intended to fish that fall, and we find no manifest error in that factual determination
Till v. Delta School of Commerce, Inc. 487 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Rogers v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury 487 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Long v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 487 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
5th Cir.1985) and its progeny.
Breaux v. Lore 487 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Sherlock v. Berry 487 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986