DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.

2744 citing documents.

  • Liberto v. Villard 386 So. 2d 930 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
  • Albritton v. JC Penney Co., Inc. 385 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    The standard for appellate review in Louisiana, and its progeny, that: "the appellate review of facts is not completed by reading so much of the record as will reveal a reasonable factual basis for the finding in the trial court; there must be a further determination that the
  • Lafleur v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 385 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    The standard of review in a : “When there is evidence before the trier of facts which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.
  • Istre v. Hudson Engineering Corp. 386 So. 2d 366 La. 1980
    as follows: “When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.” “Manifest error” was
  • Choate v. Greene 386 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    The standard of review in a : “When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.
  • Matt v. Laperouse 386 So. 2d 978 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Costs of Court to be assessed to defendant.” The standard of review in a : “When there is evidence before the trier of facts which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.
  • Johnson v. Coca Cola Bottling Co., Inc. 386 So. 2d 993 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    The standard of review in a : "When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court's finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.
  • Perniciaro v. Brinch 384 So. 2d 392 La. 1980
  • Maryland Cas. Co. v. Trahan 384 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
    [3] See Canter v. Koehring Company, La., ; First Nat.
  • Castro v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 384 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Goldberg v. Stauffer Eshleman Co. 384 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    See Canter v. Koehring Company, La., , and Arceneaux v. Domingue, La., .
  • Davis v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 385 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Brooks v. Roussel 384 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
  • Cannatella v. CITY CIVIL SERV. COM'N, ETC. 381 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
  • Smith v. State, Department of Public Safety 384 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Canter v. Koehring Co., La., (1973).
  • Calvary Tabernacle v. Louisiana Central Bank 384 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Chaney v. Commercial Union Insurance 385 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Canter v. Koehring Company, et al.
  • Troxler v. Hertz Corp. 385 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Canter v. Koehring Company, La., ; Arceneaux v. Domingue, La., .
  • Babin v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 385 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Courtney v. BASF Wyandotte Corp. 385 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    23:1032 by passing Act 147 of 1976, (1973), which had allowed executive officer suits as an additional remedy to employees.
  • Chrisham v. Blum 383 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    it is not our appellate function to substitute our evaluation of the evidence for that of the trial judge unless the record establishes that his factual conclusions are manifestly erroneous.
  • Harrison v. Howell 384 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    in which the Supreme Court stated that when there is a conflict in the testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbed upon review, even though the appellate court may feel that its own evaluation and inferences are as reasonable.
  • Taylor v. Zetz 7 Up Bottling Co. 384 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Burns v. Town of Leesville 383 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
  • Franks v. Louisiana Health Serv. & Indem. Co. 382 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
  • Deville v. LaGrange 379 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc., (La.
  • Mayes v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. 379 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    Conlay v. Houston General Insurance Co., supra.
  • Clements v. Ryan 382 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
    The factual finding of the trial judge that plaintiffs had failed, after putting in all of their evidence, to prove that communications necessary to make out a
  • Besnard v. Department of Highways 381 So. 2d 1303 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
  • Chambers v. United Cab Co. 381 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Gaudet v. North River Insurance Co. 381 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Canzoneri v. Smith 381 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Nothing in this Section shall apply to employment in private domestic service or to agricultural field occupations.” stated that the executive officer is individually liable to a third person, including co-employees, damaged solely by reason of the defendant’s individual breach of an employment-imposed duty, under the following circumstances: 1.
  • Goodwin v. Stathes 381 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    we must determine from the record and all of the evidence whether the trial court was “clearly wrong” in not finding the plaintiff totally and permanently disabled within the intent of LSA-R.S.
  • LeBoyd v. Jenkins 381 So. 2d 1290 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
    its predecessors cited therein, and its progeny.
  • Guidry v. Davis 382 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
  • Regions v. Regions 381 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
  • Richard v. Hebert's Creamery, Inc. 381 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • LeBlanc v. Tyler 381 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    it stated: "When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court's finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error."
  • Augustine v. Washington Parish Police Jury 383 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Russell v. Amiss 386 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    1st Cir. 1977), writ denied
  • Gioe v. Ducote & Lee Corp. 381 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Franklin v. Haughton Timber Co. 377 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
  • Smith v. Andrepont 378 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Hand v. Reeves 378 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
  • Miller v. Lambert 380 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
  • Lazar v. Federal Insurance Co. 380 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Wood v. Amstar Corp. 380 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Ashley v. Volkswagen of America, Inc. 380 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
  • General Refrigeration, Etc. v. Style Home Bldrs., Inc. 379 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
  • Cline v. Kroger Co. 379 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980