Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.

2744 citing documents.

Barbara Raymond v. Government Employees Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), reh’g denied, 4/27/01 () (superseded by statute on other grounds ).
Raymond v. Government Employees Insurance 40 So. 3d 1179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), , reh’g denied, 4/27/01 () (superseded by statute on other grounds).
New Orleans Jazz & Heritage Foundation, Inc. v. Kirksey 40 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
(superseded by the 1976 amendments to the Worker’s Compensation statute, La.
State Ex Rel. Tr 38 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
[1] See Stobart v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, (La.
Risk Management Services, L.L.C. v. Moss 40 So. 3d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Department Ambulance Service, 93-3099 (La.7/5/94), .
Iles v. Ogden 37 So. 3d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372, 00-1387, 00-1440, p. 10 (La.3/23/01), -13 () (superseded by statute on other grounds).
Norwood v. Medina 30 So. 3d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Alexander Marshall v. Nathan Boydston La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Scott Ferguson v. Loewer Powersports & Equipment La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), reh'g denied, 4/27/01 () (superseded by statute on other grounds ).
Marshall v. Boydston 33 So. 3d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Ferguson v. LOEWER POWERSPORTS & EQUIPMENT 33 So. 3d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), , reh’g denied, 4/27/01 () (superseded by statute on other grounds).
Menard v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 31 So. 3d 996 La. 2010
Savage v. State Farm Mutual Insurance 33 So. 3d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), , reh’g denied, 4/27/01 () (superseded by statute on other grounds).
Gereighty v. Fox 28 So. 3d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Williams 28 So. 3d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), 613 , reh’g denied, 4/27/01 () (,superseded by statute on other grounds).
Shaterika Ashley v. Antonio Strong La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Ashley v. Strong 19 So. 3d 1260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
McCaskill v. Rosiere 20 So. 3d 496 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
Guillory v. Lee 16 So. 3d 1104 La. 2009
Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), , reh’g denied, 4/27/01 () (superseded by statute on other grounds).
In Re Holliday 15 So. 3d 82 La. 2009
See, (holding that the trier of fact has a better capacity to evaluate live witnesses as compared with the appellate court’s access only to a cold record).
Shawn Bernard v. the Hartford Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Bernard v. Hartford Insurance 12 So. 3d 1098 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., Arceneaux v. Domingue, 36 , 1333 (La.1978)
Ruffin v. Burton 34 So. 3d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Simply stated, “the reviewing court must give great weight to factual conclusions of the trier of fact; where there is conflict in the testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbed upon review, even though the appellate court may feel that its own evaluations and inferences are as reasonable.”
Tanya White v. Progressive Security Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
White v. Progressive Security Ins. Co. 6 So. 3d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Harrington v. Wilson 8 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Orgeron v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Co. 1 So. 3d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Indest-Guidry, Ltd. v. Key Office Equipment, Inc. 997 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
under which an officer, agent, or employee is liable to a third person damaged solely by reason of the individual's breach of an employment-imposed duty, this court found in Laurents that Mr. Reid breached the duty of care through personal fault via the representations that he made to the plaintiffs.
Brian Cole v. Acadia Parish Sheriff's Dept. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Indest-Guidry, Ltd. v. Key Office Equipment, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
under which an officer, agent, or employee is liable to a third person damaged solely by reason of the individual’s breach of an employment-imposed duty, this court found in Laurents that Mr. Reid breached the duty of care through personal fault via the representations that he made to the plaintiff
Phillip M. Roberts v. Town of Henderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Cole v. Acadia Parish Sheriff's Dept. 998 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Roberts v. Town of Henderson 998 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Edwards v. Pierre 994 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Urology Clinic of No v. United Fire Ins. 993 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Brown v. Schwegmann 990 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Succession of Merrick 989 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Veade v. Louisiana Citizens Property Corp. 985 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Mayeux v. ROCKY & CARLO, INC. 984 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Oliver v. IMPERIAL FIRE AND CAS. INS. CO. 983 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Agnes D. Breaux v. Trisha A. Willis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
gulated by the following guideline: “When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.” ().
Breaux v. Willis 977 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Smith v. Smith 977 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
(noting that the principal that a trial court’s factual findings are entitled to deference “is based not only upon the trial court’s better capacity to evaluate live witnesses (as compared with the appellate court’s access only to a cold record), but also upon the proper allocation of trial and appellate
Johnson v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 975 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Woolfolk v. TRISM, INC. 976 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Sher v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 973 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Petticrew v. Abacus Capital Corp. 974 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Venissat v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 968 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Lindsay v. GREATER NEW ORLEANS EXPRESSAWAY COMMISSION 966 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Arceneaux v. Amstar Corp. 969 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
see also 14 Couch on Ins.3d § 202:58 (noting that [t]he determination of whether an insurer has waived any coverage or other policy defenses by defending the insured without a reservation of rights as to those defenses often involves questions of fact.)