Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Karam v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, 281 So. 2d 728.

88 citing documents.

Funck v. Surgi's Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. 537 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Co., and Redmond v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins.
Chandler v. Jones 532 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, (La.
Durham v. McFarland, Gay and Clay, Inc. 527 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
Ford v. Golemi, Albrecht Ins. 522 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
3d Cir.1972), affirmed on other grounds
Breaux v. Insured Lloyds Insurance Co. 515 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Plaquemine Bank & Trust Co. v. Grand River Towing, Inc. 510 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, (La.
Jackson & Jackson v. LA. OFFSHORE INS. 508 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
3rd Cir.1972), affirmed by the Supreme Court of Louisiana at the court stated at page 824: "There is a distinction between insurance agents who are employed by an insurance company to solicit risks and effect insurance for that company, and insurance *877 brokers, who solicit insurance from the public generally, under no employment from any special company, placing t
Many v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 505 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, see also La.CC Arts.
Dietrich v. Travelers Ins. Co. 504 So. 2d 970 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company
State v. Reliance Ins. Co. 487 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.
Naulty v. Oupac, Inc. 448 So. 2d 1322 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
3rd Cir.1972) Affirmed on other grounds
Beam v. Intercontinental Life Ins. Co. 447 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, (La.
C & a TRACTOR CO. v. Holland American Ins. Co. 445 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, ."
Bonner v. Bank of Coushatta 445 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, (La.
Foster v. American Deposit Ins. Co. 435 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
App. 3rd Cir.1972), affirmed
Hubbs v. Canova 427 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, (La.App.
Raymond v. Zeringue 422 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
3d Cir.1972), affirmed on other grounds
Smith v. Millers Mut. Ins. Co. 419 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, (La.App.
Batiste v. Security Ins. Group 416 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
3 Cir. 1972), affirmed (La.
Price v. Hooper 414 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Fasullo v. American Druggists’ Insurance Co., (4th Cir. 1972), (4th Cir. 1967), the third party petition was properly dismissed because the petition does not allege that Appalachian is a warrantor of Continental or that it may be liable to Continental, a pr
Home Insurance Co. v. Simon 411 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
3rd Cir. 1972), affirmed
Cambre v. Travelers Indem. Co. 404 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, (La.
Arceneaux v. Bellow 395 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, (La.
Union Service & Maintenance Co. v. Powell 393 So. 2d 94 La. 1980
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co., fully discussed the problem and its history; its holding is adverse to relator.
Britten v. Payne 381 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, affirmed for other reasons, and United Credit Plan of Jena
Trahan v. Bailey's Equipment Rentals, Inc. 383 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company
Arinder v. Professionals' Transportation Co. 383 So. 2d 1294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, the court said: “An insurance agent who undertakes to procure insurance for another owes an obligation to his client to use reasonable diligence in attempting to place the insurance requested and to notify the client promptly if he has failed to obtain the requested insurance.
Page v. American Motorist Ins. Co., Ltd. 381 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Ackel v. Mid-South Underwriters, Inc. 377 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
App. 3 Cir. 1972), Affirmed the Third Circuit Court comments on the distinction between an agent and broker on page 824: `There is a distinction between insurance agents who are employed by an insurance company to solicit risks and effect insurance for that company, and insurance brokers, who solicit insurance from the public generall
Stacy v. Petty 362 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, (La.App.
Merriell v. Pattison/Bayou Pontiac Co. 359 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company
Porter v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co. 357 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, : An insurance agent who undertakes to procure insurance for another owes an obligation to his client to use reasonable diligence in attempting to place the insurance requested and to notify the client promptly if he has failed to obtain the requested insurance.
American Bank & Trust Co. of Houma v. Deroche 357 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Co., and cases therein cited.
Sayre & Toso, Inc. v. Manser Agency, Inc. 351 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Paul Fire & Marine insurance Company, (La.App.
United Credit Plan of Jena, Inc. v. Hailey 341 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
3 Cir. 1972), affirmed we quoted with approval the following statement in Appleman, Insurance Law and Practice, Sec.
Walker v. Fontenot 329 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
Boothe v. American Assurance Co. 327 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company
Olsen Engineering Corp. v. Hudson Engineering Corp. 289 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company