Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Austrum v. City of Baton Rouge, 282 So. 2d 434.

42 citing documents.

Shaquana Harvey, Individually and in Her Capacity as the Natural Tutrix of Jaden Harvey v. Eric Wayne Hamby, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
“The requirement that contributory negligence must be affirmatively pleaded has for its purpose the giving of fair notice of the nature of the defense and preventing surprise.” (La.
Khristy Goins Rismiller, Tutrix For Daniel Edward Goins v. Gemini Insurance Company, Mark Isiah Gordon And Keith Boone … La. 2020
Estate of Mayeaux v. Glover 31 So. 3d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
1st Cir.1972), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, Mazoue v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 2002-1569, pp. 2-3 (La.App.
Munster v. Bill Watson Ford, Inc. 970 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Johnson v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport 792 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Louisiana & A. Ry.Co.
Boudreaux v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT 780 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
McDuffie v. ACandS, Inc. 781 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Kemper v. Don Coleman, Jr., Builder, Inc. 746 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Carr v. Hibernia National Bank, 95-1342 (La.App.
In re Mary Belsom Welsh Qualified Trust 733 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
As that court explained: In his motion to substitute, Mr. Konneker, Jr. states that he is the decedent’s only child, but Mr. Konneker, Sr. testified at trial that he “had a bunch of kids.” In view of this conflicting evidence and the movant’s failure to furnish an affidavit of death and heirship, see, -39 (La.1973), we are unable to act on the motion to substitute.
Genusa v. Robert 720 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Nichols, supra at p. 691 , (La.
Konneker v. Sewerage & Water Bd. 703 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
In view of this conflicting evidence and the movant's failure to furnish an affidavit of death and heirship, see, -39 (La.1973), we are unable to act on the motion to substitute.
Nelson v. Burkeen Const. Co. 605 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Bordelon v. Drake 578 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
Roberson v. Provident House 576 So. 2d 992 La. 1991
Pond v. Campbell, 251 La.
Day v. Day 563 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
1st Cir.1972), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds
Nichols v. Stone Container Corp. 552 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
in consolidated trials involving an intersectional collision of two vehicles, the supreme court held that reference to the contributory negligence of one of the parties in the pretrial order to which the parties agreed constituted an implied and/or express consent of the parties that it was one of the issue
Day v. South Line Equipment Co. 551 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Worley v. Winston 550 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Beauchamp v. Eckerd's Drugs of Louisiana, Inc., (La.App.
Martin v. Hertz Corp. 533 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Kobuszewski v. Scriber 518 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Sider v. Robin Temporary Service 515 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Gilcrease v. Gilcrease 438 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Carollo v. Shoney's Big Boy Enterprises 433 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Art. 1154; Barksdale v. Southern Airways, Inc., (La.App.
Sanders v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 422 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
'" Independent, Inc., v. Watson, *235 (La.App.
Hill v. Hamilton 417 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Lewis v. Till 395 So. 2d 737 La. 1981
Independent, Inc. v. Watson 394 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Durham v. Evans 377 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
Art. 1154; Barksdale v. Southern Airways, Inc., (La.App.
DLJ of Louisiana No. 1 v. Green Thumb, Inc. 376 So. 2d 121 La. 1979
Davis v. Owen 368 So. 2d 1052 La. 1979
On at least two occasions this Court has determined that survival damages should be shared equally by the survivors, (La.
Trahan v. Ritterman 368 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
wherein the Supreme Court held that the affirmative defense of contributory negligence was available to a defendant who had not raised the issue in answer but who advanced the issue at pre-trial conference.
Carter v. Salter 351 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
[3] but recognizes that Austrum does not squarely confront and discuss the issue, except in result.
Red Barn Chemicals, Inc. v. Lassalle 350 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Art. 1154; Webster v. Rushing, La., (1975); Austrum v. City of Baton Rouge, La., (1973).
Monnerjahn v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. 350 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
1st Cir. 1972), writ granted but affirmed on this point, (1973).
Moore v. Kinney 315 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Webster v. Rushing 316 So. 2d 111 La. 1975
[10] Pond v. Campbell, 251 La.
Webster v. Rushing 304 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
549 , (1942); Austrum v. City of Baton Rouge, La., (1973).
King v. Cancienne 303 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Manuel v. Soileau 304 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Explained Smith v. Manchester Insurance & Indemnity Co. 299 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
McFarland v. Illinois Central Railroad Company, La.App., .
Watkins v. Doe 301 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Terral v. Riley 293 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by