Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Petition of Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, 278 So. 2d 81.

117 citing documents.

Naquin v. Air Engineered Systems & Services, Inc. 463 So. 2d 992 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Petition of Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans
Posey v. Smith 453 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
As stated by the Supreme Court in Petition of Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, among the reasons assigned for application of the law of the case principle are: "the avoidance of indefinite relitigation of the same issue; the desirability of consistency of the result in the same litigation; and the efficiency, and the essential fairness to both sides, of affording a single opportunity
Galle v. Allstate Ins. Co. 451 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Petition of the Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans, Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Company, 261 La.
Landry v. Aetna Insurance Co. 449 So. 2d 1092 La. 1984
Succession of Cameron 446 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
As stated by the Supreme Court in Petition of Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, among the reasons assigned for application of the law of the case principle are: "...
Landry v. Aetna Insurance Co. 442 So. 2d 440 La. 1983
See CCP 2164, comment (a), and Petition of Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, La., .
Landry v. Aetna Ins. Co. 442 So. 2d 440 La. 1983
See CCP 2164, comment (a), and Petition of Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, La., .
Glenwood Hosp., Inc. v. LA. HOSP. SERVICE, INC. 419 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Petition of Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, (La.
Brumfield v. Dyson 418 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
See Petition of Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, (La.App.
Guaranty Sav. Assur. Co. v. NATIONAL AM. BK. 407 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Under the principle of the "law of the case" our prior rulings of law in Kaplan, supra, and those of the Supreme Court in its Kaplan opinion, conclusively determine the appeal now before us. See Petition of Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sh.
De Felice v. Garon 395 So. 2d 658 La. 1981
Justice Tate described the scope and effect of the doctrine in Petition of Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, : "The law of the case principle relates to (a) the binding force of trial court rulings during later stages of the trial (b) the conclusive effects of appellate rulings at the trial on remand, and (c) the rule that an appellate court will ordinarily not reconsider its own rulings of law on a subsequent appea
Wascom v. American Indem. Corp. 383 So. 2d 1037 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Petition of Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, (La.App.
La. Power & Light Co. v. La. Public Service Com'n 377 So. 2d 1023 La. 1979
Petition of Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, (La.
Arnold v. Board of Levee Commissioners 359 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
In any case, the applicability of the “law of the case” principle and situations in which a court is warranted in deviating from this policy are well stated by Justice Tate in Petition of Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans
Bowles & Edens Co. v. H & H Sewer Systems, Inc. 346 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
(footnotes omitted)” See also: Petition of Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans, Louisiana State Bar Assn. v. Theard, 225 La.
Miller v. East Ascension Telephone Company, Inc. 331 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Petition of Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans, sets forth the scope of the principle of the law of the case, stating: "The law of the case principle relates to (a) the binding force of trial court rulings during later stages of the trial, (b) the conclusive effects of appellate rulings at the trial on remand, and (c) the rule that an appellate court wil
Rivette v. Moreau 322 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
In Petition of the Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, the force of this principle was recognized to prevent piecemeal trial of defenses even where the correctness of the former decision was doubted.