Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Price, 274 So. 2d 194.

25 citing documents.

Robert James Ragland v. Katherine Diamond Ragland La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Steven Ray Killingsworth La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Springwood Homeowner's Association, Inc. v. Michelle Gutherie-Brown La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
App. 4 Cir. 1/26/05), ( (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Derwin Walker La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Jerman Neveaux La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Chandra Marts Versus Dr. Abdul Khan and Oceans Behavioral Hospital of Greater New Orleans, LLC La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
Once a judge is recused, “he has no power to act…[and a]ny action taken by a recused judgment is an absolute nullity.” (La.
State v. Brooks 124 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Art. 919, Comment (b); State v. Price, La., (1973); State v. Ash, 257 La.
State v. Franks 55 So. 3d 34 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
We noted 12that any action taken by a recused judge is an “absolute nullity,” but that a recused judge may preside over a case if something subsequently occurs to “neutralize” the cause of recusation
Rainey v. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. 35 So. 3d 215 La. 2010
State v. Franks 975 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
On this record, this court is unable to determine the merits of the defendant's claim regarding the initial recusal of Judge Michael Walker and the alleged subsequent nullity of his conviction and sentence, ("Any action taken by a recused judge is an absolute nullity.").
State v. Desoto 968 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
the Louisiana Supreme Court observed: [Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure articles 673 and 676 are] based upon similar provisions in the Code of Civil Procedure, and interpretation of the latter provisions is pertinent here.
In Re Judge Sassone 959 So. 2d 859 La. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Jake C. Desoto La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
the Louisiana Supreme Court observed: [Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure articles 673 and 676 are] based upon similar provisions in the Code of Civil 36 Procedure, and interpretation of the latter provisions is
Disaster Restoration Dry Cleaning, L.L.C. v. Pellerin Laundry Machinery Sales Co. 927 So. 2d 1094 La. 2006
1293 (1881); Tatum v. Orleans Parish School Board, 04-1190 (La.App.
Judson v. Davis 916 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Maten 899 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
art. 673; -252 (La.1979).
Tatum v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 894 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
the Supreme Court said, It has long been recognized in our civil procedure that once a judge is recused, or a motion for his recusal has been filed, he has no power to act (except to appoint the proper person to sit ad hoc when the law provides for such an appointment).
Revere v. Strain 837 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Our Supreme Court, stated, It has long been recognized in our civil procedure that once a judge is recused, or a motion for his recusal has been filed, he has no power to act (except to appoint the proper person to sit ad hoc when the law provides for such an appointment).
State v. Lewis 431 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Acadian Heritage Realty v. City of Lafayette 425 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
the State failed to file an appellate record before the legal return date and instead asked for an extension of time from a District Judge who had recused himself.
Kidd v. Caldwell 371 So. 2d 247 La. 1979
State v. Wilson 362 So. 2d 536 La. 1978
State v. Kraft 294 So. 2d 219 La. 1974
Art. 919, Comment (b); State v. Price, La., (1973); State v. Ash, 257 La.
State v. Morris 292 So. 2d 215 La. 1974
State v. Smith 284 So. 2d 576 La. 1973
Art. 919, Comment (b); State v. Price, La., (1973); State v. Ash, 257 La.