Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, 284 So. 2d 905.

73 citing documents.

Gibbs Construction, L.L.C. v. National Rice Mill, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Leon Greenblatt v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, B&K Construction Co., LLC, Cajun Constructors, LLC, Linfield, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
Philip Cash, Glenda Cash, and Philip's Family Pharmacy, Inc. v. Delhi Office Building, LLC La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
Lloyd's Syndicate 1861 v. Darwin Nat'l Assurance Co. 248 So. 3d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Thebault ex rel. Thebault v. American Home Assurance Co. 195 So. 3d 113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
and its progeny, wherein the courts in exposure cases have applied the “effect” test as opposed to the “cause” test in determining the number of occurrences.
Charles Henry Davis, Et Ux. v. Sabine Parish Police Jury La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
of New Orleans, (La.App.
Yokum v. Nicholas S. Karno II, Inc. 126 So. 3d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
of New Orleans, see generally Ferdinand F. Stone, Tort Doctrine in Louisiana: The Obligations of Neighborhood, 40 Tul.
Marshall v. Air Liquide-Big Three, Inc. 107 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
of New Orleans, and its progeny erroneous in this case.
Jones v. Capitol Enterprises, Inc. 89 So. 3d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Washington Ex Rel. Washington v. McCauley 62 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Weintraub v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 996 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
and Holzenthal v. Sewerage and Water Bd., 06-0796, p. 33 (La.App.
Yokum v. 615 Bourbon Street, LLC 977 So. 2d 859 La. 2008
Of New Orleans, and Ferdinand F. Stone, Tort Doctrine in Louisiana: The Obligations of Neighborhood, 40 Tul.
Suire v. Lafayette City-Parish Government 907 So. 2d 37 La. 2005
The Third Circuit summarized this court's opinion in Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, which, the Third Circuit stated, "address[ed] the use of sheet metal pilings."
Vicknair v. Boh Bros. Construction Co. 871 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
The plaintiffs argue that negligence is not required in order to find Boh Bros, liable, because they contend that the work performed by Boh Bros, is considered “pile-driving” per Lombard v. Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans, et al., and pile-driving is ultrahazardous activity for which strict liability applies.
Spiker v. City of Baton Rouge 804 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Kaufman v. Sewerage & Water Bd. 762 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Masters v. Courtesy Ford Co. 758 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Hunter v. Town of Sibley 745 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Provincial Hotels, Inc. v. Mascair 734 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Bd., ” Bordlee v. Pat’s Constr., supra, at p. 17.
Mossy Motors v. Sewerage and Water Bd. 753 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans
Branch v. City of Lafayette 663 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Saden v. Kirby 660 So. 2d 423 La. 1995
of N.O., William L. Crowe, Sr., The Anatomy of a Tort, 22 Loy L.Rev.
Turner v. Massiah 656 So. 2d 636 La. 1995
Miley v. Continental Ins. Co. 645 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
In the instant case, the trial court rendered judgment in favor of Hartford, but seemingly on the ground that the two sets of collisions were the result of continuous or repeated exposure to the smoke, and that according to Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, (La.
Inabnet v. Exxon Corp. 642 So. 2d 1243 La. 1994
of New Orleans, see generally Ferdinand F. Stone, Tort Doctrine in Louisiana: The Obligations of Neighborhood, 40 Tul.L.Rev.
Winchell v. Johnson Properties, Inc. 640 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
1st Cir.1972), writ denied, Lombard v. Sewer & Water Board of New Orleans, (La.App.
Saden v. Kirby 635 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
3 Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board
Whetstone v. Dixon 616 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
for the proposition that when the word "occurrence" is used in place of the word "accident," the intention is to broaden coverage and that the claim of each plaintiff should be considered a separate occurrence.
Sanchez v. Boh Bros. Construction Co. 615 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
See also Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, requiring proof of causation for an article 667 claim.
Serigne v. Wildey 612 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
however, the Supreme Court of Louisiana, in a case involving 119 plaintiffs seeking damages caused by construction and installation of a drainage canal, found coverage although there was no exact statement of just what the applicable policy insured against.
Davidson v. United Fire & Cas. Co. 576 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
In support of their position, Houston v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., (La.App.
Rochelle v. STATE, DOTD 570 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Tesvich v. 3-A's Towing Co. 547 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
However, that the claim of each plaintiff with respect to his or her leases constitutes a separate occurrence.
Jones v. Missouri Pacific Railroad 546 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, (La.
Butler v. Baber 529 So. 2d 374 La. 1988
Irving v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 517 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
471 , Ishee v. State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development, (La.App.
Houston v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc. 506 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
The Louisiana Supreme Court considered an insurance policy containing an "occurrence endorsement," (similar to the 1965 and 1966 CU policies)
Sparacello v. Andrews 501 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Maxwell v. State, Department of Transportaiton & Development 499 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Carter v. Dr. Pepper Bottling Co. 470 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
471 , (1962); Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, Ishee v. State, Through Dept. of Transp., (La.App.
Bodoin v. Daigle 452 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans
Vicari v. Melancon 446 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, (Supreme Court 1973); Marcotte v. Travelers Insurance Co., 258 La.
Buxton v. Allstate Ins. Co. 434 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, (La.
Acadian Heritage Realty v. City of Lafayette 434 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans
Bell v. Badger Dredging, Inc. 420 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
See Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, Bordlee v. Pat's Construction Company, Inc., -18 (La.App.
Ishee v. State, Through Dept. of Transp. 413 So. 2d 1362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
BM Albrecht Elec., Inc. v. Griffin 413 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, (Supreme Court 1973); Marcotte v. Travelers Insurance Co., 258 La.
Bunkie Funeral Home, Inc. v. McNutt 414 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Wetzka v. Big Three Industries, Inc. 409 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
See, e. g., Hero Lands v. Texaco, supra ; Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board, Langlois v. Allied Chemical Corp., 258 La.
Holcomb v. Kincaid 406 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans