Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Creech v. Capitol MacK, Inc., 287 So. 2d 497.

24 citing documents.

Steve Crooks v. State of La. Through the Dept. of Natural Resources La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2026
7 “Patrimony is the total mass of existing or potential rights and liabilities attached to a person for the satisfaction of his economic needs.” Creech v. Capitol Mack, Inc.
Patrick E. Phillips v. G & H Seed Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
227, overruled on other grounds, Creech v. Capitol Mack, Inc.
Phillips v. G & H Seed Co. 86 So. 3d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
227 , overruled on other grounds, Creech v. Capitol Mack, Inc.
Bagwell v. Bagwell 698 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
4th Cir.1983), reversed on other grounds, Creech v. Capitol Mack, Inc., : J. Tate concurring, which *748 concerned the second wife's claim that, upon termination of the community estate existing between her and her husband, their community estate should be reimbursed by her husband's separate estate for the amount of the support
Hebert v. Weaver 484 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
2402, 2403 and 2404; Creech v. Capitol Mack, Inc., Adams v. Golson, 174 So.
Depner v. Depner 478 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Yiannopoulos, above cited, Section 77; Creech v. Capital Mack, Inc.
PPG Industries, Inc. v. Bean Dredging Corp. 419 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
227 , overruled on other grounds, Creech v. Capitol Mack, Inc.
Mohr v. Mohr 374 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Compare, Creech v. Capitol Mack, Inc.
Emmons v. Emmons 348 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Smith v. Dendinger 349 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Creech v. Capitol Mack, Inc., La., (1973).
Kirkland v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 345 So. 2d 1175 La. 1977
The wife’s interest in the community has been described as an “imperfect ownership without use.” Creech v. Capitol Mack, Inc.
Arnold v. Arnold 345 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
Appellee concedes her only authority for requesting appellant be held personally *1023 liable for her attorney's fees is the Supreme Court decision in Creech v. Capital Mack, Inc., in which the court enabled the collection of community debts from the entirety of the husband's property.
Due v. Due 342 So. 2d 161 La. 1977
Yiannopoulos, above cited, Section 77; Creech v. Capital Mack, Inc.
Hartley v. Hartley 336 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Further, while the wife might well have incurred certain obligations needed to support herself, the debts were incurred prior to the suit for separation and constitute community obligations; Civil Code article 2403; Creech v. Capitol Mack, Inc.
Connell v. Connell 331 So. 2d 4 La. 1976
Sutton v. Sutton 320 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Plaintiff is not a seizing creditor and, therefore, Creech v. Capitol Mack, Inc., (La.
McCary's Shreve City Jewelers, Inc. v. Saucier 318 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Cf., Creech v. Capitol Mack, Inc., La., (1973).
Connell v. Connell 316 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
4 Cir. 1962), and Creech v. Capitol Mack, Inc., La., (1974).
Hastings v. Dinning 314 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Creech v. Capitol Mack, Inc.
Hodson v. Hodson 304 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Louisiana Civil Code Article 2403, providing the manner in which antenuptial debts of the husband are to be acquitted, has recently been interpreted in Creech v. Capitol Mack, Inc., which is the latest expression of the Louisiana Supreme Court on the subject.
Creech v. Capitol Mack, Inc. 299 So. 2d 802 La. 1974
Our decision in the former injunction suit is now final, Creech v. Capitol Mack, Inc., (1974).
Creech v. Capitol Mack, Inc. 296 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Following rendition on October 29, 1973, of a judgment by the Louisiana Supreme Court in the matter entitled, “Neva Felker Creech v. Capitol Mack, Inc., et al.,” reported at , wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed the previous judgments of the Nineteenth Judicial District Court and of this Court, (1972), holding that the patrimony of the former husband of Neva Felker Creech, plaintiff herein, namely, Glideville L. Creech, exigible for satisfaction of a judgment in fav
Succession of Sharp 288 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
[6] In Creech v. Capitol Mack, Inc., La., (1973), the Supreme Court held that the wife's undivided one-half ownership of community property is imperfect (lacking use and control) until dissolution of the community, at which time her ownership becomes perfect.
Sears, Roebuck and Company v. Gunn 286 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
See also Creech v. Capitol Mack Inc., La.1973, , allowing execution against the community for the husband's pre-nuptial debts, theorizing that the husband's patrimony includes community assets and liabilities, while the wife's patrimony includes only "the imperfect ownership without use of one-half of the community" (in addition to her separate property).