Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Randolph, 275 So. 2d 174.

31 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Robert Leroy McCoy 218 So. 3d 535 La. 2016
State v. Scott 131 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Guillory, 2010-1231, p. 3 (La.10/8/10), .
State v. Marzett 123 So. 3d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Guillory 45 So. 3d 612 La. 2010
State v. Miller 923 So. 2d 625 La. 2006
art. 851(5), presents a question of law reviewable under an abuse of discretion standard, State v. Bolivar, 224 La.
State of Louisiana v. Wade Knott, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Williams, 258 La.
State v. Knott 908 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Ran *32 dolph, State v. Williams, 258 La.
State v. Wright 598 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
2180 , 53 L.Ed.2d 227 (1977)
State v. Jackson 570 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. Talbot, supra, at 885
State v. Ruffin 475 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Talbot, supra, at 885
State v. Prudholm 446 So. 2d 729 La. 1984
*736 State v. Talbot, supra, at 885
State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Davis 431 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Talbot 408 So. 2d 861 La. 1981
State v. Williams, 258 La.
State v. Bell 377 So. 2d 275 La. 1979
State v. Eames 365 So. 2d 1361 La. 1979
State v. Tennant 352 So. 2d 629 La. 1977
76 , 46 L.Ed.2d 63 (1975)
State v. Rollins 351 So. 2d 470 La. 1977
State v. Tyler 342 So. 2d 574 La. 1977
State v. Robinson 337 So. 2d 1168 La. 1976
State v. Jackson, 253 La.
State v. Kenner 336 So. 2d 824 La. 1976
State v. Gilmore 332 So. 2d 789 La. 1976
art. 858; State v. Williams, 258 La.
State v. Credeur 328 So. 2d 59 La. 1976
State v. Jackson, 253 La.
State v. Howard 325 So. 2d 812 La. 1976
State v. Carruth 311 So. 2d 866 La. 1975
State v. Landrum 307 So. 2d 345 La. 1975
State v. Randolph, La., (1973), State v. Truax, 222 La.
State v. Hatch 305 So. 2d 497 La. 1974
We do not find that this presents the type of aggravated factual situation which, in State v. Randolph, La., (1973), led in part to our conclusion that the trial court had abused its discretion in refusing to order a new trial.
State v. Bradford 298 So. 2d 781 La. 1974
State v. Chavers 294 So. 2d 489 La. 1974
State v. Barfield 292 So. 2d 580 La. 1974
State v. Gilbert 286 So. 2d 345 La. 1973
In State v. Randolph, La., (decided March 8, 1973) we held that where the defendant's motion for a new trial raises the contention that there is a total lack of evidence as to an essential element of the crime charged, an indigent defendant is entitled to a free transcript of all the testimony.