Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Killingsworth, 292 So. 2d 536.

20 citing documents.

Landry v. Base Camp Management, LLC 206 So. 3d 921 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Blanchard v. Blanchard 112 So. 3d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1st Cir.1972), writ granted, rev’d in part, aff'd in part
Montgomery v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund 51 So. 3d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Costello v. Hardy 864 So. 2d 129 La. 2004
[3] The court of appeal decision relied in part on the ruling of this court in (on original hearing).
Sanches v. Morris 802 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
1973), reversed in part, affirmed in part
DESIRE NARCOTICS REHAB. CENTER v. White 732 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Dupuy v. Walther 721 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Apolinar v. Professional Construction Services, Inc. 650 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Apolinar argues that this constitutes a stipulation pour autrui citing: Whitney Nat.
Anderson v. Collins 648 So. 2d 1371 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
1st Cir.1972), writ granted, reversed in part, affirmed in part
Estate of Doucet v. Doucet 643 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Charia v. Hulse 619 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
In brief, in support of her contention that she has stated a cause of action against Hulse both in negligence and in intentional tort.
Succession of Meeks 609 So. 2d 1035 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
and Succession *1038 of Griffin, (La.App.
Penalber v. Blount 550 So. 2d 577 La. 1989
1st Cir.1972), writ granted, (1973), rev'd in part, aff'd in part
Succession of LaSalle v. Clark 503 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
1st Cir.1972), affirmed in part, reversed in part, in which the Supreme Court held that the applicable prescriptive period in a suit by legatees against the notary who improperly prepared a will which was declared invalid resulting in the loss of their legacies did not begin to run until there was a final judgment decreeing the will to be invalid.
Campbell v. Continental-Emsco Co. 445 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Guste v. Simoni, Heck & Associates
In re the Succession of Dunlap 408 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
The trial court, basing its decision on the testimony of one of the subscribing witnesses, held that the will was not typed by the Notary himself, and therefore, under the case of the on rehearing, March 25, 1974, the will must be ruled invalid for want of form.
Evans v. Evans 399 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
175 , (1967), reversed on other grounds, (1974).
In RE SUCCESSIONS OF JOHNSON v. Williams 387 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Succession of Montegut, 211 La.
Matter of Succession of Jones 369 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Succession of Montegut, 211 La.
Carter v. Succession of Carter 332 So. 2d 439 La. 1976
Succession of Montegut, 211 La.