Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Plummer, 281 So. 2d 716.
-
State of Louisiana v. Calvin King
La. 2017
1976) (“‘[W]e have uniformly held that a bill of exception reserved to the refusal of the trial judge to grant a motion for a new trial based on Article 851(1), relative to sufficiency of the evidence presents nothing for our review.’”) ( (La.
- State v. Korman 439 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
State v. Penson
351 So. 2d 1181
La. 1977
art. 858; State v. Williams, 262 La.
- State v. Fowlkes 352 So. 2d 208 La. 1977
-
State v. Rollins
351 So. 2d 470
La. 1977
of 1974, Art. 5, Section 5 (C)
- State v. Lee 340 So. 2d 180 La. 1976
- State v. Skelton 340 So. 2d 256 La. 1976
- State v. Sharp 338 So. 2d 654 La. 1976
- State v. Brown 337 So. 2d 484 La. 1976
- State v. Jack 332 So. 2d 464 La. 1976
- State v. Collins 306 So. 2d 662 La. 1975
-
State v. Hatch
305 So. 2d 497
La. 1974
State v. Plummer, La., (1973) and authorities cited therein.
- State v. Michelli 301 So. 2d 577 La. 1974
- State v. Washington 292 So. 2d 234 La. 1974
- State v. Washington 292 So. 2d 234 La. 1974