Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State, Through Department of Highways v. Hoyt, 284 So. 2d 763.

48 citing documents.

Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Hill 788 So. 2d 1154 La. 2001
State, State, State, State
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. Schwegmann Westside Expressway, Inc. 669 So. 2d 1172 La. 1996
[6] See also State Through Dept. of Highways v. Ross Continental Motor Lodge, Inc., ; State, (La.App.
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Lanier 564 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
l taking lowers the value of the landowner’s remaining property, the landowner may recover, as severance damages, the difference between the market value of the remaining property “immediately before and immediately after the taking, taking into consideration the effects of the completion of the project in the manner proposed or planned.” LRS 48:453; State
City of Shreveport v. Shreve Land Investors Partnership 556 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Keller 520 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State Through Dept. of Highways v. Bray 511 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
East Baton Rouge Parish v. Hays 498 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State, Dep't of Highways v. Denham Springs Development Co., Inc., State
Town of Church Point v. Carriere 463 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
“Usually, however, there is no market value for a strip taken for highway or other public-servitude purposes.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Harris 423 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Earlier, in State, again, Justice Tate, speaking for the court, said: “Severance damages are ordinarily calculated as the difference between the market value of the remaining property immediately before and immediately after the taking.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Bitterwolf 401 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Centuries Memorial Park Ass'n 391 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP., ETC. v. Van Willet 389 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
State, Through Dept. of Highways v. Champagne 371 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
State, Dep't of Highways v. Denham Springs Development Co., Inc., State
State, Department of Highways v. Anderson 356 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
State, Department of Highways v. Denham Springs Development Company, Inc., State
State, Dept. of Highways v. Bland 355 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
State, Department of Highways v. Denham Springs Development Co., Inc., 307 So.2d *286 304 (La.1975); State, (La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. C. F. Breaux Investment Co. 351 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
State Through Dept. of Highways v. Ruckstuhl 348 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
State Through Dept. of Highways v. Alexandria, Etc. 348 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
State, Dept. of Highways v. Denham Springs Development Co., Inc. State, (La.
State Through Dept. of Highways v. Ponder 345 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
(1973); State, Department of Highways v. Nisbet Properties, Inc., (La.App.
City of New Orleans v. Giraud 346 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
State, State, Department of Highways v. Covington Interstate, Inc., (La.App.
State, Through Dept. of Hwys. v. A. Wilbert's Sons Lbr. 346 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
State, Department of Highways v. Hoyt, La., (1973).
STATE DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS v. Romano 343 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Baton Rouge Realty Co. 339 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
This method was approved by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State, Through Department Of Highways v. Hoyt, La., (1973).
State, Department of Highways v. Advance Enterprises, Inc. 332 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS v. Westport Development Co., Inc. 332 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
State, explained this approach as follows: "As summarized by the excellent treatise, Dakin and Klein, Eminent Domain in Louisiana, p. 173 (1970), our state's jurisprudence holds: "* * * the highest and best use of the land actually taken is to be considered in determining fair market value.
State, Dept. of Hwys. v. Ross Continental Mot. L., Inc. 328 So. 2d 883 La. 1976
State, Department of Highways v. Gordy 322 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
1973) ("No error of law."); State, (La.
State, Dept. of Highways v. Model Development Corp. 322 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
In State, State, (La.App.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Dugas & LeBlanc, Ltd. 323 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
State, Dept. of Hwys. v. Ross Continental Motor Lodge, Inc. 315 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
State, Department of Highways v. Denham Springs Development Co., Inc., supra; State
STATE, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. Guste 319 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Since the rear portion of the subject property is generally lower in elevation and further from present development and utilities than the front portion, we apply a (1973); (1972).
State, Dept. of Highways v. Port Properties, Inc. 316 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
State, through Department of Highways v. Hoyt, La., (1973).
State, Dept. of Highways v. Nisbet Properties, Inc. 309 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
1973); State, State, (La.
State v. Wells 308 So. 2d 774 La. 1975
State, Department of Highways v. Hoyt, La., (1973); State, Department of Highways v. Central Realty Investment Co., 238 La.
State, Dept. of Hwys. v. Denham Springs Dev. Co., Inc. 307 So. 2d 304 La. 1975
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Evans 305 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Its authority for this position is State, (S.Ct.1973) and other cases cited which hold that different parts of the same tract can have different fair market values.
State, Department of Highways v. Anselmo 301 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
1973, ; yet the building upon the land might not be suitable to that use and therefore might not be worth (on that land) its replacement cost less depreciation for age.
State, Department of Highways v. Smith 304 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
This precise situation was contemplated in State, through Department of Highways v. Hoyt, La., (1973), where the Court said: "Usually, however, there is no market value for a strip taken for highway or other public-servitude purposes.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Hab Monsur Corp. 301 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
State, Through the Department of Highways v. Hoyt, La., (1973).
State, Department of Highways v. Wells 298 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
State, at 765 (La.1973).
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Wells 298 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
State, Dept. of Highways v. Terrace Land Co., Inc. 298 So. 2d 859 La. 1974
State, Department of Highways v. Osbon 292 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
In State, Department of Highways v. Hoyt, La., (1973), the Supreme Court stated: ".
State, Dept. of Highways v. Guaranty Realty Corp. 295 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
State, Through Department of Highways v. Hoyt, La., (1973).
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Denham Springs Development Co. 294 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Louisiana Power & Light Company v. CHURCHILL FARMS, INC. 292 So. 2d 183 La. 1974
State, State, Department of Highways v. Garrick, 260 La.
Louisiana Intrastate Gas Corp. v. Boudreaux 289 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
State, Department of Highways v. Hoyt, La., (1973).
State, Department of Highways v. Crow 286 So. 2d 353 La. 1973
See State of Louisiana, through the Dept. of Highways v. Hoyt, La., (1973).