Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 283 So. 2d 470.

15 citing documents.

State v. Washington 550 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Jones 537 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Robertson, supra
State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King 436 So. 2d 559 La. 1983
art. 703; State v. Chambers, 263 La.
State v. Doucet 359 So. 2d 1239 La. 1978
*1252 State v. Smith, La., (1973); State v. Wallace, 254 La.
State v. Dunbar 356 So. 2d 956 La. 1978
State v. Thibodeaux, supra ; State v. Medlock, supra ; "
State v. Carter 352 So. 2d 607 La. 1977
State v. Singleton 352 So. 2d 191 La. 1977
State v. Thibodeaux, supra ; State v. Medlock, supra
State v. Tillett 351 So. 2d 1153 La. 1977
State v. Lee 340 So. 2d 1339 La. 1976
State v. Finley 341 So. 2d 381 La. 1976
Moreover, we note that even construing the motion as one to sever as argued by defendants in brief, defendants' contention that a joint trial of defendants with and without criminal records would prejudice the defendants without records and therefore warrant a severance.
State ex rel. Fonseca v. Phelps 326 So. 2d 372 La. 1976
State v. Rowell 306 So. 2d 668 La. 1975
See State v. Pellerin, La., (1973); State v. Corbin, La., (1973); State v. Vassel, La., (1973); State v. Smith, La., (1973); State v. Spencer, 257 La.
State v. Medlock 297 So. 2d 190 La. 1974
and cases cited therein.
Distinguished State v. Lewis 296 So. 2d 824 La. 1974
220 (1940) and State v. Smith, La., (1973).
State v. Blackwell 298 So. 2d 798 La. 1974
(1973), the majority allowed the State to challenge for cause two prospective jurors who, after being informed on voir dire examination by the State of the severity of the penalty in armed robbery, i. e., up to 99 years without parole, probation or suspension, stated they could not be impartial because that penalty wa