Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fallon, 290 So. 2d 273.

77 citing documents.

State v. Breaux 269 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
1993) ; State v. Fallon , , 282 (La.
State of Louisiana v. David Alan Breaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Magee 150 So. 3d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
494 , 169 L.Ed.2d 346 (2007) (citing State v. Connolly, 96-1680, p. 8 (La.7/1/97), ; Bourque, 622 So.2d at 229-30 ; ).
State v. Lewis 125 So. 3d 1252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“In Louisiana, a defendant must use one of his peremptory challenges curatively to remove the juror, thus reducing his remaining peremptory challenges, or waive any complaint on appeal.” State v. Connolly, 96-1680, p. 8 (La.7/1/97), ; -230 (La.1993)
State v. Magee 103 So. 3d 285 La. 2012
Forced use of peremptory challenges — the “strike or waive” rule The defendant correctly notes that the so-called “strike or waive” rule finds its *308
State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
See, State v. Blank, 04-0204, p. 25 (La.4/11/07), (“In Louisiana, a defendant must use one of his peremptory challenges curatively to remove the juror, thus reducing his remaining peremptory challenges, or waive any complaint on appeal.”)(citing State v. Connolly, 96-1680, p. 8 (La.7/1/97), ; -80 (La.1993); ).
State v. Campbell 983 So. 2d 810 La. 2008
494 , 169 L.Ed.2d 346 (2007) ("In Louisiana, a defendant must use one of his peremptory challenges curatively to remove the juror, thus reducing his remaining peremptory challenges, or waive any complaint on appeal.")(citing State v. Connolly, 96-1680, p. 8 (La.7/1/97), ; -30 (La.1993); (La.
State v. Pinion 968 So. 2d 131 La. 2007
ng peremptory challenge waives appellate review of trial court's denial of a cause challenge to the jury); State v. Mitchell, 94-2078, p. 4 (La.5/21/96), (the Court need not reach the question of whether there was an erroneous denial of a cause challenge when the defendant struck the juror and had peremptory challenges remaining at the close of jury selection); (same).
State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
State, Department of Social Services, Office of Family Support v. Gibson 768 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Id., State v. Simien, 95-1407 (La.App.
State v. Connolly 700 So. 2d 810 La. 1997
State v. Pooler 696 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Stelly 645 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
App. 3rd Cir.1989), affirmed
State v. Brossette 634 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Bourque 622 So. 2d 198 La. 1993
("because defense counsel desires to interrogate as his witness an assistant district attorney actively engaged in the trial does not mean that the defense may compel his sequestration and disrupt the trial"); La.Code Evid.
State v. Jones 593 So. 2d 1301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Sicarelli v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 556 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
: *183 The character of the evidence upon which an expert bases his opinion is ordinarily a matter which affects the weight to be accorded the expert’s opinion.
State in Interest of Braden v. Nash 550 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
and citations therein; Patterson v. Johnson, 509 * (La.App.
Willie v. American Cas. Co. 547 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Trahan 543 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Hines v. Remington Arms Co., Inc. 522 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
the Supreme Court said: "The character of the evidence upon which an expert bases his opinion is ordinarily a matter which affects the weight to be accorded the expert's opinion.
Liner v. Terrebonne Parish School Bd. 519 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Also, the supreme court held that it is permissible for doctors testifying as experts to rely upon reports of other doctors and nurses in forming their opinions.
State v. Franklin 520 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Jones v. Gillen 504 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Thibodeaux 490 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Bradley 490 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Neumeyer v. Terral 478 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
the Louisiana Supreme Court said "[the] character of the evidence upon which an expert bases his opinion affects the weight it is accorded and has no bearing on its admissibility."
Bailey v. Douglas 478 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
(citations omitted) (La.
Barley v. State, Through State Dept. of Hwys. 463 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Kelly 456 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
wherein the Supreme Court further noted that notwithstanding the general rule against leading questions, the matter is largely within the discretion of the trial court and in the absence of palpable abuse of that discretion resulting in prejudice to the accused, a finding of reversible error is not warranted, and State v. Hollingsworth, 160 La.
State v. Wilson 454 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Cody 446 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Grigsby 445 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Guillory 438 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Ruiz 437 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Brown 428 So. 2d 438 La. 1983
State v. Moore 419 So. 2d 963 La. 1982
State v. Gaskin 412 So. 2d 1007 La. 1982
State v. Bolton 408 So. 2d 250 La. 1981
State v. Hollingsworth, 160 La.
State v. Prestridge 399 So. 2d 564 La. 1981
State v. Carthan 377 So. 2d 308 La. 1979
State v. Hollingsworth, 160 La.
State v. Murray 375 So. 2d 80 La. 1979
State v. Francis, supra ; State v. Hollingsworth, 160 La.
State v. Swift 363 So. 2d 499 La. 1978
State v. Dilworth 358 So. 2d 1254 La. 1978
State v. Drew 360 So. 2d 500 La. 1978
State v. Gray 351 So. 2d 448 La. 1977
State v. Schouest 351 So. 2d 462 La. 1977
State v. Sheppard 350 So. 2d 615 La. 1977
State v. Passman 345 So. 2d 874 La. 1977
151 , 46 L.Ed.2d 111 (1975); (La.