Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Gilbert, 286 So. 2d 345.
- State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
-
State v. Boyer
56 So. 3d 1119
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
art. 858, “[n]either the appellate nor supervisory jurisdiction of the supreme court may be invoked to review the granting or the refusal to grant a new trial, except for error of law.” ce rt.
- State v. Guillory 45 So. 3d 612 La. 2010
- State v. Fowlkes 352 So. 2d 208 La. 1977
-
State v. May
339 So. 2d 764
La. 1976
State v. Daspit, 167 La.
- State v. Brown 337 So. 2d 484 La. 1976
- State v. Jack 332 So. 2d 464 La. 1976
- State v. Wright 332 So. 2d 240 La. 1976
- State v. Woods 327 So. 2d 405 La. 1976
-
State v. Ball
328 So. 2d 81
La. 1976
appeal dismissed 420 U.S. 902 , 95 S.Ct.
-
State v. White
321 So. 2d 491
La. 1975
State v. Gilbert, La., (1973).
-
State v. Nero
319 So. 2d 303
La. 1975
State v. Gilbert, La., (1973).
- State v. Hines 319 So. 2d 313 La. 1975
- State v. Batiste 318 So. 2d 27 La. 1975
-
State v. Landrum
307 So. 2d 345
La. 1975
(1973), wherein we stated: "La.C.Cr.P.
-
State v. Johnson
306 So. 2d 724
La. 1975
such an allegation presents nothing for the Court's review.
-
State v. Lisenby
306 So. 2d 692
La. 1975
We note, however, that for the reasons expressed in State v. Gilbert, La., (1973), an allegation that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence presents nothing *695 for this Court's review and that, as earlier treated in this opinion, none of defendant's bills of exceptions have merit or demonstrate prejudicial error.
- State v. Chavers 294 So. 2d 489 La. 1974
-
State v. Stephenson
291 So. 2d 767
La. 1974
State v. Dimopoullas, 260 La.
-
State v. Baker
288 So. 2d 52
La. 1973
art. 402; , No. 53390 on the docket of this Court, decided August 20, 1973, and cases cited there.