Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Gilbert, 286 So. 2d 345.

20 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Boyer 56 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    art. 858, “[n]either the appellate nor supervisory jurisdiction of the supreme court may be invoked to review the granting or the refusal to grant a new trial, except for error of law.” ce rt.
  • State v. Guillory 45 So. 3d 612 La. 2010
  • State v. Fowlkes 352 So. 2d 208 La. 1977
  • State v. May 339 So. 2d 764 La. 1976
    State v. Daspit, 167 La.
  • State v. Brown 337 So. 2d 484 La. 1976
  • State v. Jack 332 So. 2d 464 La. 1976
  • State v. Wright 332 So. 2d 240 La. 1976
  • State v. Woods 327 So. 2d 405 La. 1976
  • State v. Ball 328 So. 2d 81 La. 1976
    appeal dismissed 420 U.S. 902 , 95 S.Ct.
  • State v. White 321 So. 2d 491 La. 1975
    State v. Gilbert, La., (1973).
  • State v. Nero 319 So. 2d 303 La. 1975
    State v. Gilbert, La., (1973).
  • State v. Hines 319 So. 2d 313 La. 1975
  • State v. Batiste 318 So. 2d 27 La. 1975
  • State v. Landrum 307 So. 2d 345 La. 1975
    (1973), wherein we stated: "La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Johnson 306 So. 2d 724 La. 1975
    such an allegation presents nothing for the Court's review.
  • State v. Lisenby 306 So. 2d 692 La. 1975
    We note, however, that for the reasons expressed in State v. Gilbert, La., (1973), an allegation that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence presents nothing *695 for this Court's review and that, as earlier treated in this opinion, none of defendant's bills of exceptions have merit or demonstrate prejudicial error.
  • State v. Chavers 294 So. 2d 489 La. 1974
  • State v. Stephenson 291 So. 2d 767 La. 1974
    State v. Dimopoullas, 260 La.
  • State v. Baker 288 So. 2d 52 La. 1973
    art. 402; , No. 53390 on the docket of this Court, decided August 20, 1973, and cases cited there.