DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Richmond, 284 So. 2d 317.

72 citing documents.

  • State v. Wilson 315 So. 2d 617 La. 1975
  • State v. Carlisle 315 So. 2d 675 La. 1975
    State v. Edwards, 261 La.
  • State v. Jones 315 So. 2d 650 La. 1975
    State v. Richmond, La., (1973); State v. Higginbotham, 261 La.
  • State v. Bell 315 So. 2d 307 La. 1975
    [4] The following cases applying article 622 demonstrate the variety of factors considered by trial judges and this court in taking evidence on motions to change venue: , La.1975; State v. Square, 257 La.
  • State v. Minor 311 So. 2d 892 La. 1975
    State v. Richmond, La., (1973).
  • State v. Elam 312 So. 2d 318 La. 1975
  • City of Baton Rouge v. Jackson 310 So. 2d 596 La. 1975
    double jeopardy did not apply when the defendant was convicted of the second of two murders which were committed during the course of an armed robbery.
  • State v. LaGarde 308 So. 2d 748 La. 1975
  • State v. Lentz 306 So. 2d 683 La. 1975
  • State v. Nelson 306 So. 2d 745 La. 1975
  • State v. Hodgeson 305 So. 2d 421 La. 1974
    and cases cited therein.
  • State v. James 305 So. 2d 514 La. 1974
    art. 797(2); -325 (La.1973); -21 (La.1973); State v. Hopper, 251 La.
  • State v. Brown 302 So. 2d 290 La. 1974
    See also State v. Richmond, La., *293 (1973); State v. Warren, La., (1973); State v. Pratt, 255 La.
  • State v. McCart 302 So. 2d 915 La. 1974
    See State v. Richmond, La., (1973); State v. Edwards, 261 La.
  • State v. Flood 301 So. 2d 637 La. 1974
  • State v. Link 301 So. 2d 339 La. 1974
    State v. Richmond, La., (1973).
  • State v. Green 301 So. 2d 590 La. 1974
    1014 , ; State v. Richmond, La., .
  • State v. Brewer 301 So. 2d 630 La. 1974
    State v. Edwards, 261 La.
  • State v. Medlock 297 So. 2d 190 La. 1974
    State v. Edwards, 261 La.
  • State Ex Rel. Wikberg v. Henderson 292 So. 2d 505 La. 1974
  • State v. Pettle 286 So. 2d 625 La. 1973
    (decided September 24, 1973) this Court held that a plea of former jeopardy could not avail a defendant who had been previously tried and convicted of the murder of one individual and was later tried and convicted of the murder of the first victim's spouse, even though both murders arose out of the same transaction, a
  • State v. Leichman 286 So. 2d 649 La. 1973
    and decisions there cited.