Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 288 So. 2d 42.

74 citing documents.

Green v. Clark 306 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc. 304 So. 2d 351 La. 1974
Smith v. Manchester Insurance & Indemnity Co. 299 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Temento v. Verdoodt 303 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Blansett v. Samuels 303 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Alexander v. Mid-South Sweeping Service, Inc. 303 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
1973); ” [ ] Also, as this court recently held, the above rule of the Spillers case is applicable to both jury and bench trials: “The trier of fact in the instant case was the district court judge.
Bitoun v. Landry 302 So. 2d 278 La. 1974
Dinvaut v. Phoenix of Hartford Insurance 302 So. 2d 294 La. 1974
Co., La., ), and, on the other hand, the appropriate function of appellate courts in Louisiana is the review of factual determinations of the trial courts.
Watts v. Town of Homer 301 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
DeBose v. Trapani 295 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
South Texas Lloyds v. Guarantee Insurance Co. 299 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
See, also: Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
Vaughn v. Manchester Insurance & Indemnity Co. 296 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Revon v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins. Co. 296 So. 2d 257 La. 1974
Co., Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
Maturin v. Scotty Brick Co. 292 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Supreme Court of Louisiana, handed down December 3, 1973: "We are not convinced that the [judge] jury was mistaken."
Chedotal v. Roundtree 295 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Co., La.1973, -44 , “It has all been said before.
Spillers v. MONTGOMERY WARD & COMPANY, INC. 294 So. 2d 803 La. 1974
285 , (1971); (1973); (1973).
Taft v. Gist 293 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
See also Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., La., (1973).
Molton v. Avrard 293 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Hoffman v. All Star Insurance Corp. 288 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
995 , , Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al, La., (1973).
Locascio v. Lake Terrace Center, Inc. 293 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Bono v. Cousins 291 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Boutte v. Hargrove 290 So. 2d 319 La. 1974
More recently, , (both rendered December 3, 1973 and rehearings denied January 11, 1974).
Napp v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 291 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Though the exact amount and type of future treatment may be said to be speculative, we were admonished in the case of Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al., La., , dated December 3, 1973, Rehearing Refused January 11, 1974; that we should hold apparently speculatory future wages are within the realm of damages envisioned within Louisiana Civil Code Article 1934(3).
Fahrig v. Pearson 288 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
(handed down by the Supreme Court of Louisiana on December 3, 1973) (1973) and cases cited therein.