Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jones v. Breaux, 289 So. 2d 110.

21 citing documents.

Huntington v. National Automotive Insurance 704 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Succession of Carrier v. Allstate Insurance 702 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
We find unpersuasive plaintiffs’ (La.App.
Dennison v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 645 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
plaintiffs averred that the lease agreement could not limit coverage under the Liberty Mutual policy to individuals specifically named in the lease agreement where the lease agreement was not incorporated into the insurance policy, in violation of LSA-R.S.
La. Maintenance Services, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London 616 So. 2d 1250 La. 1993
Lindsey v. Colonial Lloyd's Ins. Co. 595 So. 2d 606 La. 1992
Applying the analysis used by other states, on public policy grounds rather than on the Entire Contract Policy Statute.
McGill v. Winnins 593 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Schroeder v. BOARD OF SUP'RS 577 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Schroeder v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University 577 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Overruled Hearty v. Harris 574 So. 2d 1234 La. 1991
However, we overruled Normand , and held a non-named driver could fall under the omnibus clause in the rental agency's insurance policy under certain circumstances.
Waldrip v. CONNECTICUT NAT. LIFE INS. CO. 566 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
Waldrip v. Connecticut National Life Insurance Co. 566 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Hearty v. Harris 559 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
the lease agreement prohibited use of the vehicle by anyone not named in the agreement.
Fontana v. Foster 547 So. 2d 1328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Marsh v. Reserve Life Ins. Co. 516 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Smith v. Republic National Life Ins.
Whittington v. Sowela Technical Institute 438 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
This argument and the cases cited in support thereof, (La.App.
Lunda v. Sauer 389 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
and Grady v. Allstate Ins.
Grady v. Allstate Ins. Co. 355 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
confronted a problem similar to that raised in the instant case and concluded that liability coverage existed.
Hughes v. Southeastern Fidelity Ins. Co. 340 So. 2d 293 La. 1976
1st Cir. 1955); (injured party seeking recovery from lessor's insurance company when permittee of lessee is driving the car).
Spain v. Travelers Insurance Company 332 So. 2d 827 La. 1976
Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies Inc. 321 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
In addition to the statute, Newark relies upon Jones v. Breaux, La., , which held that the provisions of an automobile rental agreement, not made part of the policy insuring the vehicle, could not limit policy coverage.
Lauer v. Dickinson 299 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
(1974), the Louisiana Supreme Court [6] in a recent case involving a rental agreement which prohibited persons under 21 years of age from driving or using the vehicle (similar to the instant case) and an insurance policy, with substantially the same provisions defining an "insured" as in the instant case, [7] held tha