DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hermes v. Hermes, 287 So. 2d 789.

18 citing documents.

  • Carolyn Dauzat Marcotte v. Thomas Ernest Marcotte La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    the mere fact that a man and woman are alone together does not necessarily create a presumption that adultery was committed.
  • Marcotte v. Marcotte 886 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    the mere fact that a man and woman are alone together does not necessarily create a presumption that adultery was committed.
  • Sibley v. Sibley 693 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    [7] (wife and paramour saw each other almost daily); Tampira, 539 So.2d at 983 (paramour slept at wife's home three nights a week for several months); Breaux, 323 So.2d at 487 (wife shared trailer with paramour for two and one-half months).
  • Larocca v. Larocca 606 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • Larocca v. Larocca 597 So. 2d 1000 La. 1992
    And most notably, where the only issue before this court was whether the husband sustained his burden of proving adultery by circumstantial evidence, the court affirmed an adultery judgment where the only evidence presented by the husband was that of private investigators who had conducted surveillance on the wife.
  • Roberts v. Roberts 519 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
  • Hub Detectives, Inc. v. Martinez 515 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • Weaver v. Weaver 438 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Kendrick v. Kendrick, 232 La.
  • Seal v. Seal 421 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Kendrick v. Kendrick, 232 La.
  • Hebert v. Hebert 381 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    at p. 790: “In Kendrick v. Kendrick, 232 La.
  • Billiot v. Rivere 378 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    which held that the testimony of detectives as to specific actions on dates in question, coupled with supporting circumstances, as sufficient to exclude any reasonable hypothesis but that adultery was committed.
  • Adams v. Adams 357 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
  • Bruner v. Bruner 356 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
    a case which is analogous both factually and legally to the present suit.
  • Cade v. Cade 351 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
  • Bennett v. Bennett 349 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    (1st Cir. 1975); Hermes v. Hermes, La., (1973).
  • Coleman v. Coleman 352 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
    and Kendrick v. Kendrick, 232 La.
  • Everett v. Everett 345 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
  • Hermes v. Hermes 327 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
    [3] Hermes v. Hermes, La., .