Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Harvey v. Havard, 287 So. 2d 780.
- Ricko Construction, Inc. v. Owen Dubois La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
- Ricko Construction, Inc. v. Dubois 57 So. 3d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
-
Delacroix Corp. v. Dean
901 So. 2d 1188
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
(1973), wherein the Court clarified that a trespass action is not one of the real actions (petitory, possessory, or boundary) provided for in the Code of Civil Procedure.
- Bennett v. Louisiana Pacific Corp. 693 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
- Owens v. Smith 541 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- Phillips v. Town of Many 538 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- Manzanares v. Meche 506 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
- Brown v. Bedsole 447 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
- Garrett v. Martin Timber Co., Inc. 391 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
-
Shaffett v. Vicks
385 So. 2d 419
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
1 Cir. 1973), affirmed, : "It is difficult to argue with the proposition that in determining whether a trespass has been committed, the boundary must be located with certainty."
- Truly v. Woodard-Walker Lumber Co. 383 So. 2d 1329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
- Young v. Morvant 358 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
-
Holt v. Morgan
344 So. 2d 84
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
1st Cir., 1973), affirmed, Lo-Bar Development Company, (La.App.