DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Barnard, 287 So. 2d 770.

22 citing documents.

  • State v. Robert 956 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    In support of his argument, *755 (1973), in which the court held that when a sentence is imposed prior to the delay provided by law and without a waiver of the delay, the sentence imposed is null and must be set aside.
  • State v. Shoemaker 488 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    Likewise, in State v. Warren, supra; the exclusion of a defense witness was upheld where the witnesses’s testimony would be merely cumulative.
  • State v. Allen 431 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    On review, this court will look to the facts of the individual case to determine whether the violation resulted in prejudice to the defendant, and will inquire whether the exposure was sufficient to affect the witness' testimony or to undermine the opposing party's ability to cross-examine.
  • State v. Davis 399 So. 2d 1168 La. 1981
  • State v. Lewis 367 So. 2d 1155 La. 1979
    On review, this court will look to the facts of the individual case to determine whether the violation resulted in prejudice to the defendant, and will inquire whether the exposure was sufficient to affect the witness' testimony or to undermine the opposing *1159 party's ability to cross-examine.
  • State v. Gray 351 So. 2d 448 La. 1977
    The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, in Barnard v. Henderson, 514 F.2d 744 (5th Cir. 1975), granted habeas corpus to a defendant whose conviction had been previously affirmed by this court, where the defendant was denied an opportunity to conduct an independent ballistics test on the weapon allegedly used in the offense charged.
  • State v. Ardoin 340 So. 2d 1362 La. 1976
  • State v. McDaniel 340 So. 2d 242 La. 1976
    State v. Coleman, 254 La.
  • State v. Bias 337 So. 2d 426 La. 1976
    State v. Coleman, 254 La.
  • State v. Roberts 331 So. 2d 11 La. 1976
  • State v. Mouton 327 So. 2d 413 La. 1976
  • State v. White 321 So. 2d 491 La. 1975
    *494 The trial judge relied upon this Court's decision in State v. Barnard, La., (1973).
  • State v. Monk 315 So. 2d 727 La. 1975
    and State v. Jones, 263 La.
  • State v. Lewis 315 So. 2d 626 La. 1975
    [1] Among the many federal decisions which have set aside Louisiana convictions on such grounds on habeas review are: Barnard v. Henderson, 514 F.2d 744 (CA 5 1975) (denial of pre-trial inspection and testing of physical evidence, including ballistics testing), Flanagan v. Henderson, 496 F.2d 1274 (CA 5, 1974) (denial of pre-trial study of a fingerprint, and of scientific analysis of sperm from victim, and of pre-trial statements of prosecution witnesses which might contain exculpatory informati
  • State v. Nance 315 So. 2d 695 La. 1975
  • State v. Bird 302 So. 2d 589 La. 1974
  • State v. Flood 301 So. 2d 637 La. 1974
    State v. Landry, 262 La.
  • State v. Frierson 302 So. 2d 605 La. 1974
  • State v. Lane 302 So. 2d 880 La. 1974
  • State v. Cordier 297 So. 2d 181 La. 1974
  • State v. Brooks 294 So. 2d 503 La. 1974
  • State v. Hollingsworth 292 So. 2d 516 La. 1974
    and numerous cases cited therein.