Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Corbin, 285 So. 2d 234.

33 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Eric Dale Mickelson La. 2014
  • State v. Thomas 711 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Morris 691 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Jackson 654 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Guy 575 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Burns 504 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    (1973), [sic] we discussed impeachment of a witness premised upon his reputation in a specific, limited group.
  • State v. Graham 486 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    State v. Richey, 258 La.1094, (1971); writ denied, 464 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct.
  • State v. Young 480 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    (Dixon, J., concurring).
  • State v. Shepard 468 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    1094 , (1971) for the proposition that hypothetical questions and questions which call for prejudgment of any supposed set of facts are not permissible on voir dire.
  • State v. Hocum 456 So. 2d 602 La. 1984
  • State v. Vaughn 431 So. 2d 358 La. 1983
  • Manale v. Department of Police 376 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
    the Commission found the polygraph test inadmissible and concluded that the City's case had to stand or fall without the results of the tests.
  • State v. Perkins 374 So. 2d 1234 La. 1979
    (on rehearing); State v. Howard, 262 La.
  • State v. Catanese 368 So. 2d 975 La. 1979
  • State Ex Rel. Fields v. Maggio 368 So. 2d 1016 La. 1979
  • State v. Titus 358 So. 2d 912 La. 1978
    This Court continues to hold that polygraph test results are inadmissible in criminal trials, and that the willingness or unwillingness of a person to submit to such an examination is likewise inadmissible.
  • State v. Marshall 359 So. 2d 78 La. 1978
  • State v. Dominick 354 So. 2d 1316 La. 1978
  • State v. Vinet 352 So. 2d 684 La. 1977
    (1972); McCormick on Evidence, § 207 (2d ed. 1972); Annotation, Physiological or Psychological Truth and Deception Tests, 23 A.L.R.2d 1306 .
  • State v. Whitmore 353 So. 2d 1286 La. 1977
    State v. Davis, La., (1977); State v. Governor, La., (1976); State v. Corbin, La., (1973); State v. Refuge, 264 La.
  • State v. Davis 351 So. 2d 771 La. 1977
    State v. Governor, La., (1976); State v. Corbin, La., (1973); State v. Refuge, 264 La.
  • State v. Trosclair 350 So. 2d 1164 La. 1977
    In State v. Corbin, La., (1973), we discussed impeachment of a witness premised upon his reputation in a specific, limited group.
  • State v. Schouest 351 So. 2d 462 La. 1977
    *469 (La.1973); State v. Refuge, 264 La.
  • State v. Milby 345 So. 2d 18 La. 1977
  • State v. Tyler 342 So. 2d 574 La. 1977
  • State v. Hunter 340 So. 2d 226 La. 1976
  • State v. Governor 331 So. 2d 443 La. 1976
  • State v. Clark 325 So. 2d 802 La. 1976
    State v. Square, supra .
  • State v. Muse 319 So. 2d 920 La. 1975
    15:491; State v. Corbin, La., (1973).
  • State v. Nero 319 So. 2d 303 La. 1975
    See State v. Corbin, La., (1973).
  • State v. Batiste 318 So. 2d 27 La. 1975
  • State v. Rowell 306 So. 2d 668 La. 1975
    See State v. Pellerin, La., (1973); State v. Corbin, La., (1973); State v. Vassel, La., (1973); State v. Smith, La., (1973); State v. Spencer, 257 La.
  • State v. Thorson 302 So. 2d 578 La. 1974