Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Garlington v. Kingsley, 289 So. 2d 88.

30 citing documents.

Papania v. State ex rel. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University 108 So. 3d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
204 , (1969), the board’s duty to furnish the hospital with reasonably adequate supplies, equipment and facilities for use in treatment and diagnosis of patients, (La.App.
Brenna Davis v. Women & Children's Hospital Lake Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5 McLin v. Breaux, 05-1911 (La.App.
Davis v. Women & Children's Hospital Lake Charles 74 So. 3d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
204 , (1969), McLin v. Breaux, 05-1911 (LaApp.
Grimes v. LOUISIANA MEDICAL MUT. INS. CO. 29 So. 3d 505 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
204 , (1969), overruled on other grounds
McLin v. Breaux 950 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Bujol v. Entergy Services, Inc. 833 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
[33] This case was identified as Grant v. Touro Infirmary and overruled on other grounds in Garlington v. Kingsley , (La.
Sherman v. Touro Infirmary Hospital 832 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
at 858 )); (“Prospective [only] application of judicial decisions is the exception rather than the general rule of law.” ( overruling doctrine of charitable immunity, should operate prospectively only.)); Charles v. United States, 15 F.3d 400 , 402 n. 4 (5th Cir.1994) (“ ‘Generally, [under Louisiana law] unless a decision specifies otherwise, it is given both retrospective and prospective effect.’ ” (quoting Succession of Clive
Lacoste v. Crochet 751 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
", rehearing denied (02/15/1974).
Armand v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN 729 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
204 , (1969), overruled on other grounds by, the board's duty to furnish the hospital with reasonably adequate supplies, equipment and facilities for use in treatment and diagnosis of patients; (La.App.
Hollingsworth v. Bowers 690 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
204 , (1969), overruled on other grounds
Glass v. First United Pentecostal Church 676 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Fruge's Heirs v. Blood Services, 506 F.2d 841 (U.S. 5th Cir.1975); (La.App.
Distinguished State v. Montz 632 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Whetstone v. Dixon 616 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
We note that the Louisiana Supreme Court abolished the doctrine of charitable immunity as a
Goldking Properties Co. v. Primeaux 478 So. 2d 1207 La. 1985
(citing Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., ): In a civilian jurisdiction such as ours, in which courts are bound to follow the positive law, case law should not supplant legislative or constitutional authority.
Sibley v. Bd. of Sup'rs of Louisiana State University 477 So. 2d 1094 La. 1985
Sibley v. BD. OF SUP'RS OF LA. ST. UNIV., ETC. 446 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Overruled Block v. Reliance Ins. Co. 433 So. 2d 1040 La. 1983
82 , 74 L.Ed.2d 78 (1982)
DeBattista v. Argonaut-Southwest Ins. Co. 403 So. 2d 26 La. 1981
Harris Mortg. Corp. v. Johnson 383 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
3rd Cir. 1973), reversed on other grounds (La.App.
Easley v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, NJ 372 So. 2d 1067 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
South Central Bell Tel. Co. v. Traigle 367 So. 2d 1143 La. 1978
Shylock, Inc. v. Covenant Broad. Corp. of La. 352 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
3rd Cir. 1973), reversed on other grounds, La., .
Vincent v. Ryder Enterprises, Inc. 352 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Taylor v. Castille 318 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
759 , ; , reversed on other grounds
Green v. State, Southwest Louisiana Charity Hosp. 309 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
overruling Grant v. Touro Infirmary, 254 La.
Warden v. Southwest Louisiana Hospital Association 300 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Connor v. Methodist Hospital 297 So. 2d 660 La. 1974
We granted this writ which presents the question of "charitable immunity" (La.
Jackson v. Doe 296 So. 2d 323 La. 1974
The respondent has correctly stated that the primary issue originally presented when this writ was granted (the question of charitable immunity)
State, Dept. of Highways v. Beaird-Poulan, Inc. 292 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
-92 (La., 1974), Associate Justice Barham, for the court, pointed out: "The refusal of writs by this Court, which is usually based upon incomplete records and ex parte applications and without hearing, is not decisional law.
Colonial Pipeline Company v. Agerton 289 So. 2d 93 La. 1974

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by