Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Boutte v. Hargrove, 290 So. 2d 319.

28 citing documents.

Duroncelet v. McLendon 801 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
that recompense for pain and suffering cannot be calculated with precision.
Smith v. State Dept. of Health & Hosp. 676 So. 2d 543 La. 1996
Bush v. Arrow International 646 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Co., Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
Roberson v. Provident House 559 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Davis v. Sewerage and Water Bd. 555 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Adams v. Phillips 506 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Breaux v. Lore 487 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Sherlock v. Berry 487 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Johnson v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 476 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Hayes v. Commercial Union Assur. Co. 459 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Conner v. Florida Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. 446 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Lofton v. Whimper 425 So. 2d 1307 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Marshall v. Commercial Union Ins.
Walton v. William Wolf Baking Co., Inc. 406 So. 2d 168 La. 1981
Ricard v. State 390 So. 2d 882 La. 1980
4th Cir.), writ denied, (1973), affirmed
Clofort v. Matmoor, Inc. 370 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
See Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra
Lanclos v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 366 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Co., Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co., ; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
Billeaud v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 349 So. 2d 1379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
1974); Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
Billeaud v. UNITED STATE FIDELITY & GUAR. CO. 349 So. 2d 1379 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
1974); Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
Gaudet v. Allstate Ins. Co. 346 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
Co., Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Revon v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins.
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc. 341 So. 2d 332 La. 1977
Co., Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
Howard v. Acosta 340 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
1974); Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
Chriss v. Manchester Insurance & Indemnity Company 308 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
4th Cir. 1973), amended on other grounds, La., (1974)], invasion of privacy [Fontenot v. Magnolia Petroleum Co., 227 La.
Pear v. Labiche's Inc. 305 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc. 304 So. 2d 351 La. 1974
1974); Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
Shipman v. Tardo 304 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
The cases are now legion for the proposition that appellate courts should not alter awards for a general damage unless there is a clear showing of abuse of a great discretion afforded to the trial judge in making such awards, e. g., (S.Ct.
Gianakis v. Mayen 301 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Revon v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins. Co. 296 So. 2d 257 La. 1974
More recently, this Court adhered to the principles set forth in the above cited authorities in Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., , handed down by this Court on April 29, 1974; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., supra; and Walker v. Champion, supra.
Malone v. Yager 295 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974