Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Scurlock Oil Company v. Getty Oil Company, 294 So. 2d 810.

39 citing documents.

Shaun Steckler v. Lafayette Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Steckler v. Lafayette Consolidated Government 76 So. 3d 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Hoover Tree Farm, L.L.C. v. Goodrich Petroleum Co. 63 So. 3d 159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
3d Cir.1973), rev’d in part, Iberian Oil Corp. v. Texas Crude Oil Co., 212 F.Supp.
FIVE N COMPANY LLC v. Stewart 850 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
[15] In support of its holding, the Ditch court cited two cases that also involved successors in title, (La.
Butler v. Reeder 628 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
McLean v. Smith 593 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
and Quinette v. Delhommer, 247 La.
Amerson v. LOUISIANA DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT 570 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
McNeal v. Normand 552 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Succession of Cahn 545 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Jensen Const. Co. v. DEPT. OF TRANSP. OF DEV. 542 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Vico Concrete Company, (La.App.
Lowe v. Prejean 540 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Landry v. Thibaut 523 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Ryan v. Grandison Trust 504 So. 2d 844 La. 1987
the court found an identity in thing demanded because each suit sought cancellation and termination of identical leases obtained by the lessee from the landowners at approximately the same time.
Ryan v. Grandison Trust 490 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Hope v. Madison, 194 La.
Distinguished Brown v. Mayfield 488 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
A situation not unlike, but also distinguishable from ours
Dart v. Ehret 466 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Succession of Kilpatrick 422 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Gremillion v. Town of Cottonport 420 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Braquet v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund 419 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
4th Cir. 1981); (La.App.
Continental Insurance Co. v. Lute 418 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
New Orleans Mortgage Co., (La.App.
Emory v. Gardner 415 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Sylvester v. St. Landry Parish Police Jury 414 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Reaux v. Iberia Parish Police Jury 411 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
and cases cited therein.
Lambert v. Maryland Cas. Co. 403 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
[10] Scurlock Oil Company v. Getty Oil Company, La., ; McKean v. Campbell, La.App., ; New Orleans Mortg.
Ditch v. Finkelstein 399 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
1121 , (1965), rehearing denied 1965; on remand
Estate of Whitley v. Anning 392 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
3rd Cir. 1973), writ issued, modified, on remand, (La.App.
Bissett v. Bissett 393 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
RG Claitor's Realty v. Juban 391 So. 2d 394 La. 1980
Norah v. Crawford, 218 La.
Tassin v. Sayes 386 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Distinguished Mullins v. State 378 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1979
wherein the Supreme Court provided a guideline for review: “In Louisiana res judicata is stricti juris, and the second suit should not be barred when there is any doubt of the applicability of Article 2286.” At 818.
McKean v. Campbell 372 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
New Orleans Mortgage Company, (La.App.
New Orleans Mortg. Co., Inc. v. City of Kenner 362 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Welch v. Crown Zellerbach Corp. 359 So. 2d 154 La. 1978
Cameron Meadows Land Co. v. Bullard 348 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
474 , (1956); Parten v. Webb, 205 La.
Scurlock Oil Co. v. Getty Oil Co. 344 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
3 Cir. 1973) reversed, and Waterbury’s (La.App.
Aetna Finance Co. v. Antoine 343 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
Mitchell v. Bertolla 340 So. 2d 287 La. 1976
New Orleans Firefighters v. City of New Orleans, 263 La.
Rivette v. MOREAU (ESTATE OF MISTRIC) 336 So. 2d 864 La. 1976
Art. 2286; Scurlock Oil Company v. Getty Oil Company, La., (1974); Giroir v. Dumesnil, 248 La.
Scurlock Oil Co. v. Getty Oil Co. 324 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
The Supreme Court, however, remanded the case to the trial court solely for the purpose of terminating “all controversies over well costs and operating expenses.”

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by