Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite LeBrane v. Lewis, 292 So. 2d 216.

261 citing documents.

Busby v. St. Paul Ins. Co. 673 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Emoakemeh v. Southern University, 654 So.2d at 476-77 ; Weatherford v. Commercial Union Ins.
Timmons v. Silman 675 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Patterson v. Al Copeland Enterprises, Inc. 667 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Mayeur v. Campbell 666 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
McLain v. Safeway Insurance 662 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Latullas v. State 658 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Benoit v. Roche 657 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Emoakemeh v. Southern University 654 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Fallon v. Sullivan 650 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Weatherford v. Commercial Union Ins. 650 So. 2d 763 La. 1995
Massey v. Decca Drilling Co., Inc. 647 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Luccia v. Cummings 646 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
and in other later cases, (La.App.
Vaughan v. Hair 645 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Orgeron on Behalf of Orgeron v. McDonald 639 So. 2d 224 La. 1994
Dismuke v. Quaynor 637 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
the Supreme Court held that the employer is liable for a tort committed by his employee if, at the time, the employee was acting within the course and scope of his employment.
Hill v. West American Ins. Co. 635 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Bohmfalk v. City of New Orleans 628 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
the Supreme Court further defined vicarious liability.
Himel v. Sheraton Hotel of New Orleans 625 So. 2d 156 La. 1993
Washington v. Reed 624 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Benoit v. Capitol Mfg. Co. 617 So. 2d 477 La. 1993
Doe v. Roman Catholic Church 615 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
See Rowell, 500 So.2d at 751 ; -18 (La.1974); Blanchard v. Ogima, 253 La.
Wilson v. Advance Paper Co., Inc. 612 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Henry v. Taco Tio, Inc. 606 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Benoit v. Capitol Manufacturing Co. 606 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Johnson v. Gantt 606 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Price v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development 608 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Price v. LOUISIANA DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 608 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Roberts v. Benoit 605 So. 2d 1032 La. 1992
Samuels v. Southern Baptist Hosp. 594 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Barto v. Franchise Enterprises, Inc. 588 So. 2d 1353 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Aaron v. New Orleans Riverwalk Ass'n 580 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Williams v. Butler 577 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
the supreme court held an employer liable when one of its kitchen supervisors stabbed a subordinate employee in an altercation following the supervisor's firing of the employee and while escorting him off the premises.
Cousineau v. Johnson 577 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
e determined whether the “tortious conduct of the [employee is] so closely connected in time, place, and causation to his employment-duties as to be regarded a risk of harm fairly attributable to the employer’s business, as compared with conduct instituted by purely personal considerations entirely extraneous to the employer’s interests.” Lamkin, 498 So.2d at 1070-1071
Barnes v. Thames 578 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Cazenave v. Pierce 568 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Francioni v. Rault 570 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Williams v. Markel Lumber Co. 566 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Ermert v. Hartford Ins. Co. 559 So. 2d 467 La. 1990
Blanchard v. Ogima, supra.
Orrill v. Ram Rod Trucking 557 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Guidry v. Freeman 555 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Castille v. All American Ins. Co. 550 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Morgan v. Stanley Stores, Inc. 550 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Ermert v. Hartford Ins. Co. 531 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
In a leading case interpreting the above decision, *514 (La.1974), the court based the liability of the employer on the following conclusion: [T]he tortious conduct of the supervisor was so closely connected in time, place and causation to his employment-duties as to be regarded a risk of harm fairly attributable to the employer's business, as compared with conduct mo
Garrison v. Anderson National, Inc. 522 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Austin v. Pascarelli 522 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
pecific inquiry is whether the employee’s tor-tious conduct “was so closely connected in time, place and causation to his employment duties as to be regarded a risk of harm fairly attributable to the employer’s business, as compared with conduct motivated by purely personal considerations entirely extraneous to the employer’s interest.”
Kogos v. Payton 522 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Brannan v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc. 516 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Pierce v. Ellis 519 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Bennett v. Corroon and Black Corp. 517 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Hebert v. Witherington 520 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987