DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Meichel, 290 So. 2d 878.

25 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Melvin Miguel La. 2019
  • State v. Becnel 904 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    2301 , 110 L.Ed.2d 112 (1990); ).
  • State v. Shed 828 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Shed 828 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Jones 757 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
  • State v. Freeman 727 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    2301 , 110 L.Ed.2d 112 (1990)
  • State v. Ellis 657 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
  • State v. Dorociak 493 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Oliver 448 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    While the Louisiana Supreme Court has strictly interpreted this requirement ( [La.1974]), the U.S. Supreme Court declared the Coolidge phrase "immediately apparent" an "unhappy choice of words."
  • State v. Thompson 448 So. 2d 666 La. 1984
  • State v. Knowles 438 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    In support of his argument that the plain view doctrine is not applicable under the facts of this case
  • State v. Rodriguez 396 So. 2d 1312 La. 1981
  • State v. Stott 395 So. 2d 714 La. 1981
  • State v. Roberds 393 So. 2d 715 La. 1981
  • State v. Reed 388 So. 2d 776 La. 1980
  • State v. Pomes 376 So. 2d 133 La. 1979
  • State v. Banks 363 So. 2d 491 La. 1978
  • State v. Carter 363 So. 2d 893 La. 1978
    992 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1968); State v. Williams, La., (1977); State v. Meichel, La., (1974).
  • State v. Braud 357 So. 2d 545 La. 1978
  • State v. Parker 355 So. 2d 900 La. 1978
  • State v. Fearn 345 So. 2d 468 La. 1977
  • State v. Jewell 338 So. 2d 633 La. 1976
    of the contents of the ashtray and insofar as the inspection of the bottle's contents) exceeded the purpose for which authorized; and that noting a small pill bottle in plain view in an ashtray, does not necessarily confer upon a governmental agent the right to seize it and open it, in absence of any indication that it contains contraband or evidence relevant to the search
  • State v. Nine 315 So. 2d 667 La. 1975
  • State v. Navarro 312 So. 2d 848 La. 1975
    this Court held that an officer "* * * does not have the right to seize any object in his view in order to examine it and determine if it is or would be evidence in a criminal prosecution.
  • State v. Sears 298 So. 2d 814 La. 1974