Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hicks, 286 So. 2d 331.

14 citing documents.

  • State v. Willie 235 So. 3d 1339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Leroy McCoy 218 So. 3d 535 La. 2016
  • State of Louisiana v. Ronald Lazaro La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    finding that “[i]t is not essential to the crime of aggravated burglary of an inhabited dwelling that a person be present in the dwelling at the time of the unauthorized entry.” See also State v. Hall, 35,151 (La.App.
  • State v. Lazaro 125 So. 3d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    finding that “[i]t is not essential to the crime of aggravated burglary of an inhabited dwelling that a person be present in the dwelling at the time of the unauthorized entry.” See also State v. Hall, 35,151 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Renee Tyler La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    the trial courts granted the defendants psychiatric examinations, which fell short of a request for a full-blown sanity commission, and ruled on the merits of whether a reasonable ground existed for appointment of a sanity commission.
  • State v. Tyler 89 So. 3d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    the trial courts granted the defendants psychiatric examinations, which fell short of a request for a full-blown sanity commission, and ruled on the merits of whether a reasonable ground existed for appointment of a sanity commission.
  • State v. Haley 873 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    App.2d Cir.9/26/01), , citing
  • State Ex Rel. Seals v. State 831 So. 2d 828 La. 2002
    1980), the trial courts granted the defendants psychiatric examinations, which fell short of a request for a full-blown sanity commission, and ruled on the merits of whether a reasonable ground existed for appointment of a sanity commission.
  • State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
    1520 , 67 L.Ed.2d 818 (1981)("Neither the testimony of his mother nor that of Dr. Ellington created a reasonable ground to doubt defendant's mental capacity to proceed."); (When defense counsel presented no evidence on the motion for appointment of a sanity commission, and the psychiatrist asked by the court to examine the defendant reported that the defendant appeared to have the capacity to proceed, "[t]he only logical conclusion that can be drawn from this record is th
  • State v. Hall 796 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Martin 769 So. 2d 1168 La. 2000
    either the testimony of his mother nor that of Dr. Ellington created a reasonable ground to doubt defendant's mental capacity to proceed."); ("Here the trial judge called a recess, had defendant examined by a psychiatrist, and allowed testimony from the doctor which was to the effect that there was no evidence of any mental disorder."); (La.
  • State v. Smith 677 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Black 627 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Conn 420 So. 2d 1123 La. 1982