Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Edwards, 287 So. 2d 518.

40 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Darryl Puderer La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Sherman R. Holloway La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State v. Brazell 245 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1980) ; State v. Edwards , , 525 (La.
State v. Seals 83 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
(citing State v. Doucet, 177 La.
State v. Diggs 1 So. 3d 673 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
” in interpreting the Code of Criminal Procedure in an instance where it was silent, this Court stated: “The provisions of our Code of Criminal Procedure are intended ‘to provide for the just determination of criminal proceedings.’ They are to be construed ‘to secure simplicity in procedure, fairness in admin
State v. Odom 993 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Larry Surratt and Cynthia Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Surratt 932 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Karen D. Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State of Louisiana v. Cynthia Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Anderson 877 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Logan 822 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Hansbro 796 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Stephenson 766 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Shipp 712 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Foster 647 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Brown 557 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Thomas 552 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Comeaux at 1106
State v. Clark 466 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Doucet, 177 La.
State v. Gibson 460 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. James 459 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Freeman 447 So. 2d 1145 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Stewart 389 So. 2d 1321 La. 1980
State v. Booker 385 So. 2d 1186 La. 1980
Although the legislature's classification of an offense as a responsive verdict is entitled to great weight in deciding whether it is included in the charged offense, constitutionally the substantive elements of the crime definitions must govern in determining whether due process notice of lesser charges is included in an indictment.
State v. Eaker 380 So. 2d 19 La. 1980
State v. Glover, 262 La.
State v. Mathews 375 So. 2d 1165 La. 1979
art. 464 and commentary; (La.
State v. Wilson 363 So. 2d 481 La. 1978
State v. Gilmore, La., (1976); State v. Edwards, La., (1973); State v. Ford, 259 La.
State v. Burge 362 So. 2d 1371 La. 1978
See State v. Edwards, La., (1973).
State v. Ferguson 358 So. 2d 1214 La. 1978
State v. Drew 360 So. 2d 500 La. 1978
1975); State v. Curry, 263 La.
State v. Meunier 354 So. 2d 535 La. 1978
State v. Hunter 343 So. 2d 143 La. 1977
15:447 and 15:448; State v. Batiste, La., (1975); State v. Morgan, La., (1974); State v. Edwards, La., (1973); State v. Curry, 263 La.
State v. Gilmore 332 So. 2d 789 La. 1976
State v. Mims 329 So. 2d 686 La. 1976
State v. Mitchell 319 So. 2d 357 La. 1975
In State v. Edwards, La., , in interpreting the Code of Criminal Procedure in an instance where it was silent, this Court stated: "The provisions of our Code of Criminal Procedure are intended `to provide for the just determination of criminal proceedings.'
State v. Batiste 318 So. 2d 27 La. 1975
State v. Monk 315 So. 2d 727 La. 1975
State v. Watson 301 So. 2d 653 La. 1974
State v. Morgan 296 So. 2d 286 La. 1974

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by