DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hicks, 301 So. 2d 357.

13 citing documents.

  • State v. McArthur 702 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    However, as the jurisprudence has clarified, the other crime must be distinctively similar in system, I.e., "so peculiarly distinctive that one must logically say that they (the two crimes) are the work of the same person," (concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Dennis) (La.1976).
  • State v. Crawford 672 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    However, as the jurisprudence has clarified, the other crime must be distinctively similar in system, I.e., `so peculiarly distinctive that one must logically say that they (the two crimes) are the work of the same person,' (concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Dennis) (La.1976).
  • State v. Piazza 478 So. 2d 1318 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Lewis 358 So. 2d 1285 La. 1978
    In order to be admissible to prove identity the other crimes must be distinctively similar in system, or "so peculiarly distinctive that one must logically say that [the two crimes] are the work of the same person."
  • State v. Showers 359 So. 2d 104 La. 1978
    However, as the jurisprudence has clarified, the other crime must be distinctively similar in system, — i. e., "so peculiarly distinctive that one must logically say that they [the two crimes] are the work of the same person," (concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Dennis) (La.1976).
  • State v. Nelson 357 So. 2d 1100 La. 1978
  • State v. Frentz 354 So. 2d 1007 La. 1978
    "As the jurisprudence has clarified, the other crime must be distinctively similar in system, —i. e., `so peculiarly distinctive that one must logically say that they [the two crimes] are the work of the same person,' (concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Dennis) (La.1976).
  • State v. Holstead 354 So. 2d 493 La. 1977
  • State v. Jackson 352 So. 2d 195 La. 1977
    As the jurisprudence has clarified, the other crime must be distinctively similar in system, —i. e., "so peculiarly distinctive that one must logically say that they [the two crimes] are the work of the same person," (concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Dennis) (La.1976).
  • State v. Ballard 351 So. 2d 484 La. 1977
    As the jurisprudence has clarified, not only must the other crime be distinctively similar in system, but the proof of the other crime as part of the system must be relevant to prove a fact of consequence to the accused's present innocence or guilt (independent of the inadmissible purpose to infer that the accused committed the present crime because he had committed the other one).
  • State v. Gaines 340 So. 2d 1294 La. 1977
  • State v. Lee 340 So. 2d 1339 La. 1976
  • State v. Overton 337 So. 2d 1201 La. 1976
    Brown v. United States, supra ; (La.