Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brown, 288 So. 2d 339.

21 citing documents.

State v. Fairley 645 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Augustine 555 So. 2d 1331 La. 1990
1974); State v. Scott, 249 La.
State v. Valasquez 376 So. 2d 129 La. 1979
State v. Berain 360 So. 2d 822 La. 1978
See State v. Brown, La., (1974).
State v. Cox 352 So. 2d 638 La. 1977
State v. Billiot, 254 La.
State v. McZeal 352 So. 2d 592 La. 1977
State v. Porter 344 So. 2d 1031 La. 1977
State v. Everfield 342 So. 2d 648 La. 1977
State v. Lee 340 So. 2d 180 La. 1976
holding such argument permissible.
State v. Brumfield 329 So. 2d 181 La. 1976
State v. Maiden, 258 La.
State v. Nix 327 So. 2d 301 La. 1975
It does not require full pre-trial discovery, nor is it designed to compel disclosure of the detailed evidence upon which the state will rely to prove its case.
State v. Lucien 323 So. 2d 784 La. 1975
State v. Maiden, 258 La.
State v. Singleton 321 So. 2d 509 La. 1975
State v. Malmay 315 So. 2d 286 La. 1975
State v. Triplett 313 So. 2d 227 La. 1975
By this assignment of error, he contends (a) that by his bill of particulars he was entitled to certain specifics of evidentiary information (Bill No. 2), to which he is not entitled under present law, and (b) that no reference was permissible to a rape committed on the decedent by the defendant as part of the single continuous transaction culminating in the murder (Bill No. 93), again a contention rejected by the jurisprudence, State v. Curry, 263 La.
State v. Clark 305 So. 2d 457 La. 1974
State v. Devail 302 So. 2d 909 La. 1974
State v. Devall 302 So. 2d 909 La. 1974
Followed State v. Frierson 302 So. 2d 605 La. 1974
State v. Dotch 298 So. 2d 742 La. 1974
State v. Roquemore 292 So. 2d 204 La. 1974