Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Butler, 294 So. 2d 512.

28 citing documents.

Richardson v. Parish of Jefferson 727 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Sanders v. Gore 676 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
In the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: The law's attitude toward the marriage relation has been stated as follows: "public policy, good morals, the highest interest of society require that the marriage relations should be surrounded with every safeguard and their severance allowed only for the causes specified
Williams v. General Motors Corp. 639 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
The cases cited by plaintiff, (La.
Drury v. Fawer 590 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Oppenheim v. Bouterie 505 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
McLaurin v. Holley 484 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Moore, Romero & Co. v. Nan Corp. 458 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Pasquier, supra; Grimaldi, supra
Bordelon v. Crutcher 430 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Succession of D'Antoni 430 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Succession of D’ Antoni, supra; Succession of Williams, supra.
Pasquier v. Ewing 430 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Smith v. McMichael, 381 * (La.App.
Tutorship of Perret 434 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
4th Cir.1981); City Stores Co. v. Gervais F. Favrot Co., Inc., (La.App.
LeBlanc v. Opt, Inc. 421 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Olivier v. Doga 384 So. 2d 330 La. 1980
The Court of Appeal found that the contract was against public policy, relying on
Smith v. McMichael 381 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Veterans Electrical Service, Inc. v. Robley J. Gelpi & Sons, Inc. 369 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
1974, , holds that the quasi-contrae-tual payment due to avoid unjust enrichment is not due, within C.C.
Olivier v. Doga 368 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
We held that the contract was void as it offended public policy
Capitano v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc. 359 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Sugar Field Oil Co. v. Carter, 214 La.
Schaff v. Landers 355 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
We are not unaware of the admonition of Succession of Butler, La.1974, , that the trial judge in attorney’s fee cases has broad discretion in fixing “quantum meruit” (a theory of recovery questioned by Oil Purchasers, Inc. v. Kuehling, La.1976, ).
Brewer v. Scullin 353 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Blair v. Diaz 342 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
Morse v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc. 344 So. 2d 1353 La. 1977
Succession of D'Antoni 342 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
*1283 In assessing such fees, the trial judge is vested with much discretion in making such an award as is provided in Article 1934 of the Louisiana Civil Code, (La.
Guillory v. Guillory 339 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
[2] Succession of Butler, La., ; Tanner v. Tanner, 229 La.
Berard v. Latham 334 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Ap-pellee does not contest this contention which is supported by
Brummett v. Hamel's Dairy, Inc. 324 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
In a later case, the Supreme Court held: "We agree with the contention of defense counsel that in a suit in quantum meruit interest is not allowed from the date of judicial demand.
Gauguin, Incorporated v. Spring 316 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
James, Robinson, Felts & Starnes v. Powell 303 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
Defendant argues that these decisions represent incorrect departures from the holdings of the Supreme Court in (La.S.Ct.
Aucoin v. Williams 295 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
After the decision in the district court, our Supreme Court rendered its decision in Succession of George E. Butler, La., , (1974).