Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Woodfox, 291 So. 2d 388.
-
State v. Broussard
269 So. 3d 1094
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Woodfox , ; State v. Jennings , 07-150 (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Damon Broussard
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Jennings, 07-150 (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Ricky Joseph Langley
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Jennings, 07-150 (La.App.
-
State v. Langley
61 So. 3d 747
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Jennings, 07-150 (La.App.
-
State v. Carter
974 So. 2d 181
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
P. art. 841; State v. Griffin, XXXX-XXXX (La.App.
-
State v. Brent
775 So. 2d 565
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the failure of the trial court to rule on a motion to quash is an irregularity or error in the proceedings to which a defendant must object.
- State v. Pratt 748 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
- State v. Forrest 701 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
- State v. Dillon 631 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
- State v. Augustine 555 So. 2d 1331 La. 1990
-
State v. Hopkins
351 So. 2d 474
La. 1977
State v. Navarre, 292 So.2d (La.1974)
- State v. Monroe 305 So. 2d 902 La. 1974
-
State v. Lonigan
298 So. 2d 739
La. 1974
we held that where a motion to quash had not been acted upon by the trial judge and defendant proceeded to trial, the motion was *742 abandoned.