Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hunt v. Bogalusa Community Medical Center, 303 So. 2d 745.

101 citing documents.

Borne v. St. Francis Medical Center 655 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Griffin v. Kinberger 647 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
2nd Cir.1983], [La.1974].)
Alello v. Smith 641 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Smith v. LOUISIANA HEALTH & HUMAN RES. 637 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
("It is the hospital's duty to protect a patient from dangers that may result from the patient's physical and mental incapacities as well as from external circumstances peculiarly within the hospital's control.") (
Bordelon v. St. Frances Cabrini Hosp. 640 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources 635 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Gilbert v. Akins 631 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
9:2794 C (doctors); (hospitals); rather, the question is one of negligence.
Cornett v. STATE THROUGH WO MOSS REG. HOSP 614 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Cornett v. State ex rel. W.O. Moss Regional Hospital 614 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Godeaux v. Rayne Branch Hospital 606 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Galloway v. Baton Rouge General Hosp. 602 So. 2d 1003 La. 1992
Hunt v. Bogalusa Community Medical Center
McLain v. Glenwood Regional Medical Center 602 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Jones v. Rapides General Hosp. 598 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Brown v. EA Conway Memorial Hosp. 588 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
The trial court, correctly noted that a hospital has a duty to exercise that amount of care toward a patient that the patient's condition may require; that a determination whether that duty has been breached depends on the facts and circumstances of the case; and that a hospital may be held liable for the negligent conduct
Austin v. St. Charles General Hosp. 587 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
specifying that: A hospital is bound to exercise the requisite amount of care toward a patient that the particular patient's condition may require.
Tabor v. Doctors Memorial Hosp. 563 So. 2d 233 La. 1990
Lucas v. St. Frances Cabrini Hosp. 562 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
the Louisiana Supreme Court set out the duty of a hospital: "A hospital is bound to exercise the requisite amount of care toward a patient that the particular patient's condition may require.
Cangelosi v. OUR LADY OF LAKE REG. MED. CTR. 564 So. 2d 654 La. 1990
Palermo v. NME Hospitals, Inc. 558 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Lejeune v. Rayne Branch Hosp. 556 So. 2d 559 La. 1990
Parker v. Southwest Louisiana Hospital Ass'n 540 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
A determination of whether a hospital has breached the duty of care it owes to a particular patient depends upon the circumstances and the facts of that case.”
Parker v. SOUTHWEST LOUISIANA HOSP. ASS'N 540 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Estate of Anderson v. Charity Hospital of Louisiana at New Orleans 537 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Berry v. RAPIDES GENERAL HOSP., INC. 527 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
our Supreme Court defined the duty of a hospital towards its patients: "A hospital is bound to exercise the requisite amount of care toward a patient that the particular patient's condition may require.
Smith v. State Through Dept. HHR 523 So. 2d 815 La. 1988
Keyworth v. Southern Baptist Hospitals, Inc. 524 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
the Supreme Court stated: A hospital is bound to exercise the requisite amount of care toward a patient that *58 the particular patient's condition may require.
Smith v. State Through Dept. of HHR 517 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Bergeron v. Houma Hosp. Corp. 514 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Coleman v. Touro Infirmary of New Orleans 506 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Hastings v. Baton Rouge General Hospital 498 So. 2d 713 La. 1986
Mariano v. Tanner 497 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Sibley v. BD. OF SUPERVISORS OF LA. 490 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Smith v. Doe 483 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Sibley v. Bd. of Sup'rs of Louisiana State University 477 So. 2d 1094 La. 1985
Matranga v. Sara Mayo Hosp. 463 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Bossier v. Desoto General Hosp. 442 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Daniel v. ST. FRANCIS CABRINI HOSP. ETC. 415 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
The duty owed to decedent by defendant, which the trial court found that defendant had breached, on page 747, as follows: "A hospital is bound to exercise the requisite amount of care toward a patient that the particular patient's condition may require.
Roark v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 415 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Dillon v. Hospital Affiliates of Baton Rouge 407 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Allor v. Lockridge 403 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Richard v. Southwest Louisiana Hospital Ass'n 383 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
3rd Cir. 1977), set out the standard of care a hospital owes to its patients, wherein the court stated as follows: ` our Supreme Court has stated the duty of a hospital toward its patients as follows: `"A hospital is bound to exercise the requisite amount of care toward a patient that the particular patient's condition may require.
Daniels v. Conn 382 So. 2d 945 La. 1980
this Court, setting forth the care required to be exercised toward a patient, stated: "A hospital is bound to exercise the requisite amount of care toward a patient that the particular patient's condition may require.
Daniels v. Conn 378 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Tolbert v. STATE, THROUGH LA. HEALTH, ETC. 370 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard of care applicable to hospitals as follows: "A hospital is bound to exercise the requisite amount of care toward a patient that the particular patient's condition may require.
Tolbert v. State ex rel. Louisiana Health & Human Resources Administration 370 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard of care applicable to hospitals as follows: “A hospital is bound to exercise the requisite amount of care toward a patient that the particular patient’s condition may require.
Bryant v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 365 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
3rd Cir. 1977), set out the standard of care a hospital owes to its patients, wherein the court stated as follows: " our Supreme Court has stated the duty of a hospital toward its patients as follows: "`A hospital is bound to exercise the requisite amount of care toward a patient that the particular patient's condition may require.
Moreaux v. Argonaut Ins. Co. 350 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Williams v. SISTERS OF INCARNATE WORD, ETC. 341 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Jenkins v. Bogalusa Community Med. Center 340 So. 2d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Goodeaux v. Martin Hospital, Inc. 333 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
as being analogous and controlling the instant case in this respect.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by